Recent content by Sardines

What the hell? Does he think he's going to be able to be as corrupt as Clarence Thomas? He better eat his ****ing Wheaties.

That's pretty much the only way I would not vote for Biden. I'm kidding, but I would be pissed. I'd give him a pass if it was part of a deal for Trump to GTFO of politics.

Sure and to that, these are people in NYC where they hate Trump. Normally the place you come from is a strong advantage to you, but for Trump it's the opposite, just sayin'.

No. They had a couple of specific messages today. The charges against Trump would normally be misdemeanors, but they were elevated to felonies (there is criteria for how this happens, what they're saying is that the criteria wasn't met, I guess?). This is clearly and without question a...

Funny enough when they did come in they came in with a specific unified message using almost identical language.

**** yes. Bill for sure should be in prison. I absolutely stopped supporting him when he looked directly into the camera and lied to the U.S. people about abusing Monica Lewinski in the Oval Office. I have not supported him at all since then. I believe he is a criminal and should be treated as such.

I'm going to go pick up a bottle and have a little solo celebration tonight.

deal

No. I'm not worried about this at all. I hope the powerful people in our society are held to the same standard a street level pot dealer is held to. Our prisons are filled with non-violent drug offenders, yet the elite **** all of us daily and we call it a minor white collar crime. People...

I'll take that bet. If on first appeal all convictions are thrown out completely with no retrial I'll pay.

Funny seeing the talking points repeated almost verbatim. Bah bah bah says the sheep

Well I guess time will tell.

This trial is brought by the state of New York to address crimes that Trump has been convicted of committing. A crime was committed, charges were filed, a trial was held, a verdict was reached. That's what this was. No man is above the law.

Uhhh, I think the fact that this was not a mixed verdict (34 individual counts) and came back relatively quickly means that the evidence was pretty strong. What do you base your legal analysis on?