What's new
By:

College Basketball '14-15......

Dr. Jones said:
agree.. but he is usually the best ever. srs.
Click to expand...

X's and O's I think he's pretty good. Obviously a great recruiter but it's more than that. He makes kids who have been 'the man' their whole lives play 20 minutes and score 9 points. AND play defense. That is super impressive to me and I think people overlook it a lot.

I've heard a couple extended radio interviews with him. I like that he doesn't try and fake what he's doing. He's not apologizing or rationalizing. Hes trying to make 19 year olds millionaires, and no one does it better.
 
Kentucky looked really suspect defensively. Towns is gonna have a field-day vs. Frank if they match up, but they not have anyone who can stop their perimeter players. Nigel will beast them.
 
dalamon said:
Kentucky looked really suspect defensively. Towns is gonna have a field-day vs. Frank if they match up, but they not have anyone who can stop their perimeter players. Nigel will beast them.
Click to expand...

Yes, we did. However, every other team in history has lost a game at this point. Our bad games have still been W's. We are historically the best defensive team of all time.. I wouldn't presume a 2nd straight game of unfocus.
 
Dr. Jones said:
Yes, we did. However, every other team in history has lost a game at this point. Our bad games have still been W's. We are historically the best defensive team of all time.. I wouldn't presume a 2nd straight game of unfocus.
Click to expand...

Wisconsin's offense > Notre Dames. And Notre Dame's defense was the worst defense in the Elite 8. UK looks suspect, and I'm not even trolling.
 
Towns does look a bit chubby though, kind of like Bynum... hopefully he won't have issues with his knees in pro's
 
dalamon said:
Wisconsin's offense > Notre Dames. And Notre Dame's defense was the worst defense in the Elite 8. UK looks suspect, and I'm not even trolling.
Click to expand...

I'm going opposite tbh. THAT was the game to lose and they didn't. Not sure anything can stop them now.

(Except Duck Rodgers)
 
If Wisconsin can get good dribble penetration, and leave UK guards in the dust on the perimeter-- it zaps the bigmen away, leaving the offensive boards free for the taking. The Irish damn near won tonight from Grant's play alone. Irish got what they wanted on O for the most part-- they lost tonight because they refused to change their defensive scheme on KAT.
 
dalamon said:
Wisconsin's offense > Notre Dames. And Notre Dame's defense was the worst defense in the Elite 8. UK looks suspect, and I'm not even trolling.
Click to expand...

I agree with Wiscy's offense, but by that logic, Ole Miss and Texas A&M (neither did anything) is better than Kansas, West Virginia, UCLA, UNC, etc..
 
Dr. Jones said:
I agree with Wiscy's offense, but by that logic, Ole Miss and Texas A&M (neither did anything) is better than Kansas, West Virginia, UCLA, UNC, etc..
Click to expand...

I'm talking statistically, man. Everyone knows that Notre Dame had the worst defense out of all the teams left. Their execution and poise were among the best-- but their offense is nothing without Grant. Wiscy is a 5-headed snake.
 
The biggest thing the Irish have on the Badgers is poise. The Irish had probably the most poise in this tournament. If jump-shots aren't falling, I can see Wisconsin just caving in. The Irish are way better (from what little I've seen) at having offensive cohesion, and discipline.

But, if Dekker & Frank are hitting shots, and Nigel gets in the mix too? Tough matchup for UK.
 
I hate that I am taking the whole board on, so let me just say I respect Wisconsin. I have said since preseason that they are the team most likey to beat UK.

No need to reinforce, I'm not fighting it.. I probably agree anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top