What's new

Following 2016 potential draftees

I don't agree with this at all. U talk about Hayward like he's dime a dozen type of player. I think I like him as a player a lot more then u.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You think? Bentley thinks Hayward isn't even worth 7 million. You are talking to a senile oldman who probably still thinks sodie pops cost a nickel.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
If he bust it won't cost us much? Only 6 years of player development for our best player

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
I think he meant it won't cost us much in terms of wins and losses next year and down the road if we replace Hayward with murray and bazemore or something and hood and Burks step up in Haywards absence.

I think if we did this trade then we make the playoffs next year and probably lose in the first round.

We max Hayward next year and we probably lose in the first round of the playoffs next year two but maybe we look a bit better losing.

I think that a core of exum, mack, hood, burks, bazemore (or another similar level free agent.... Who I think more likely to come to the jazz after the void Hayward leaves) favors, lyles, gobert, murray/dunn/chriss/hield/whoever, puertle/skal/luwawoo/furkan/baldwin/whoever is about the same as a core of exum, mack, burks, hayward, hood, lyles, favors, Gobert, luwawaou/puertle/skal/baldwin/furkan/blah blah blah.

In other words, we are about the same good... Unless murray or whoever is a homerun pick (No one knows until a few years later) then we end up much better.
 
Simmons.

Ingram and Bender

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
So there are three guys in the first tier? Then the #3 pick would get a tier 1 dude? All the better

Oh wait I see. Those are two tiers. So we would get a 2nd tier guy rather than a third tier guy like I have been hearing.
 
I think he meant it won't cost us much in terms of wins and losses next year and down the road if we replace Hayward with murray and bazemore or something and hood and Burks step up in Haywards absence.

I think if we did this trade then we make the playoffs next year and probably lose in the first round.

We max Hayward next year and we probably lose in the first round of the playoffs next year two but maybe we look a bit better losing.

I think that a core of exum, mack, hood, burks, bazemore (or another similar level free agent.... Who I think more likely to come to the jazz after the void Hayward leaves) favors, lyles, gobert, murray/dunn/chriss/hield/whoever, puertle/skal/luwawoo/furkan/baldwin/whoever is about the same as a core of exum, mack, burks, hayward, hood, lyles, favors, Gobert, luwawaou/puertle/skal/baldwin/furkan/blah blah blah.

In other words, we are about the same good... Unless murray or whoever is a homerun pick (No one knows until a few years later) then we end up much better.
None of those players would replace Hayward and make our team as good or even close. It'd be a huge loss.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
None of those players would replace Hayward and make our team as good or even close. It'd be a huge loss.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
I broke down the rosters and they don't look much different to me.
 
So there are three guys in the first tier? Then the #3 pick would get a tier 1 dude? All the better

Oh wait I see. Those are two tiers. So we would get a 2nd tier guy rather than a third tier guy like I have been hearing.
That is just my opinion on Bender. That would be stupid to trade Hayward for Bender. If you want Bender you trade Favors or Gobert, not Hayward.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
That is just my opinion on Bender. That would be stupid to trade Hayward for Bender. If you want Bender you trade Favors or Gobert, not Hayward.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Would love to trade favors or Gobert for a top pick too.
I didn't think they would get us there.
 
Well I guess that shows your knowledge of the Jazz.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Yep. Way better than yours. Hayward has not done all that much for the team in the win loss column. And I know about all the excuses. Doesn't change that fact. Hell, last year we looked great when he was out with injury. I know I know. Sample size. Still doesn't change the fact that we looked great without him.
His stats have not been improving on a year by year basis if you account for minutes. I know I know, his teammates are not good enough for his stats to improve.
He has never been an all star. I know I know, his point guards have not been good enough to help get him there.
 
Back
Top