Chris Mannix offers a pretty good solution for the Carmelo/NY situation:
I think it makes sense. Win-win for both sides. BOS has a boatload of picks they can offer NY. Isiah-Anthony-Horford sounds like a pretty nice trio going forward for BOS. It also gives BOS a star (albeit an old one), and a chance to take Cleveland on (LeBron is ageing too isn't he?).
Carmelo should consider Boston
A meeting of the minds between Knicks president Phil Jackson and Carmelo Anthony eased tensions in New York — for now. But Anthony is in Year Three of a five-year contract, and it’s hard to see how the Knicks can be anything more than a fringe contender the next two seasons. Best-case scenario: The Knicks are able to lure Chris Paul to New York next summer. Worst case: The Knicks continue to strike out with marquee free agents, and ‘Melo finishes his Knicks career with back-to-back lottery trips.
Anthony loves New York, but there is a team nearby that could offer him a coveted chance to compete for a title: Boston. The Celtics have assets (Jae Crowder, Marcus Smart, picks) and could put together a strong offer. Anthony would fill Boston’s void as a wing scorer, and an Anthony-Isaiah Thomas-Al Horford core would be a legitimate threat to Cleveland.
Would Anthony — who has a no-trade clause, as well as a 15 percent trade kicker — be interested? There are no signs yet that he would. But with the Knicks season slipping away, Anthony may have to decide if winning a championship is a priority. Boston offers opportunity. New York does not.
I think it makes sense. Win-win for both sides. BOS has a boatload of picks they can offer NY. Isiah-Anthony-Horford sounds like a pretty nice trio going forward for BOS. It also gives BOS a star (albeit an old one), and a chance to take Cleveland on (LeBron is ageing too isn't he?).