This.Acquiring Rubio without losing anyone is a job well done for a team that desperately needs PG talent.![]()
Opposite. It significantly lowers it. It now makes sense why the reports of Teo to the Bulls were happening. Jazz probably informed him they were either getting Rubio or Hill and not to wait for them.
I don't know. That's got to be why we are doing this, right?
Rubio doesn't really entice Hayward to stay.
What's your point? If they trade westbrook and go into a rebuild, it turns into 2 2nd rounders in 3 years.
I disagree. Rubio is much lower priced and not as good as Hill. It only makes sense that the Jazz would have a greater chance of spending MLE-type money on a backup PG now.
This.
All that happened was we took a good player for almost nothing because we could.
I just really want to know if this is the Millers being cheap ****s or a move the Jazz think actually improves the team.
Sorry, [MENTION=253]Saint Cy of JFC[/MENTION], I'm talking about Rubio vs. Hill. I now realize you're probably talking about Rubio vs. neither Rubio nor Hill.
I just really want to know if this is the Millers being cheap ****s or a move the Jazz think actually improves the team.
Looks like the Twolves want to pass us next year....
****ing RUBIO? So **** Exum's development AGAIN. ****!!!!
You know **** it all. I just can't right now...
I feel like Im on Clutchfans right now.
Wow.. is this for real? I sure don't know what to think about this trade. Btw how many years left on his contract?
I disagree. Rubio is much lower priced and not as good as Hill.