I've watched Utah twice this year and they are just exceedingly average.
I really really like Tillman though. He might go pro after a year.
I really really like Tillman though. He might go pro after a year.
No, not at all. He was used and developed perfectly.Seeing how Kuzma has played in the NBA, it's becoming more clear to me that he was grossly misused as a Ute.
Not what everyone and Tobey and his 10 sisters have been saying. That and common sense of knowing that a dude who goes under the radar, and barely gets drafted in the first round but then goes on to blow it up in the NBA while making a great case for ROTY - in one of the deepest draft classes in recent memory was surely misused. He was not developed perfectly and if you watched him in college and in the NBA, you can clearly see way more tools that he has that weren't utilized in college. There's no way he added all these tools he's show casing in less than a year. Dude wasn't taken advantage of by Larry and it cost Kuzma millions. He should have easily been a top 10 pick and is playing like a top 3 right now.No, not at all. He was used and developed perfectly.
Lol. You can't read worth ****.Kuzma is playing awesome.... there must be a problem with his development.
![]()
Just cuz you and some scouts are too stupid to watch tape doesn't mean Utah did anything wrong. It was perfect development.Not what everyone and Tobey and his 10 sisters have been saying. That and common sense of knowing that a dude who goes under the radar, and barely gets drafted in the first round but then goes on to blow it up in the NBA while making a great case for ROTY - in one of the deepest draft classes in recent memory was surely misused. He was not developed perfectly and if you watched him in college and in the NBA, you can clearly see way more tools that he has that weren't utilized in college. There's no way he added all these tools he's show casing in less than a year. Dude wasn't taken advantage of by Larry and it cost Kuzma millions. He should have easily been a top 10 pick and is playing like a top 3 right now.
I agree with some stuff you say, but not on this. Make a logical case of why he was used and developed perfectly (I expect you to call me stupid and say some tongue-in-cheek comment that's only funny to you.)
Saint Cy, the posterboy of Jazzfanz.
Called it. Dude can't make an argument without insulting someone.Just cuz you and some scouts are too stupid to watch tape doesn't mean Utah did anything wrong. It was perfect development.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fo...e-kuzma-the-lakers-record-setting-rookie/amp/So how did he ever last until the fourth pick from the bottom of the first round? According to NBA executives and scouts who saw him play for the University of Utah, he just didn’t make much of an impact in 96 college games. That’s no small sample. While he improved his overall shooting to slightly over 50 percent by the time he declared for the NBA, his three-point shooting numbers (32%, 26%, 32%) and free throw shooting (63%) hardly helped his draft stock.
As one Western Conference GM said of the 6-9 Kuzma, now starting sometimes at forward for the Lakers: “Teams that had seen him play for three years in college saw a nice, all-around player without a position. They saw a non-range shooter and an average athlete.”
It must be difficult for Kuzma’s college opponents to believe that this is the same player who made only 51 three’s in 169 attempts (30%) during his Utah career.
Wow lazy scouts and GMs blame someone else other than themselves.
So let's hear your argument as to why Kuzma's play dropped him in the draft and why he's been so much better as a pro. Look, I like Larry, but this is obviously something in retrospect he has to think about. Was it the player or the system that wasn't taken advantage of or both. I'd say, from watching Kuzma last year, the system killed his game. He went from a projected top 5 guy to almost falling out of the draft's first round. That and the Utes had a mediocre season at best with one of the best players in the country.Wow lazy scouts and GMs blame someone else other than themselves.
So let's hear your argument as to why Kuzma's play dropped him in the draft and why he's been so much better as a pro. Look, I like Larry, but this is obviously something in retrospect he has to think about. Was it the player or the system that wasn't taken advantage of or both. I'd say, from watching Kuzma last year, the system killed his game. He went from a projected top 5 guy to almost falling out of the draft. That and the Utes had a mediocre season at best with one of the best players in the country.
Ok, why YOU thought that, but it was apparent no one else, who mattered, thought that. If he really was the best like you say, don't you wonder why he dropped?I wrote many post pre-draft on why I thought Kuzma was a lottery talent and best PF in the draft.
Because scouts, GMs, and fans are prone to groupthink. People get things wrong. People whose professional success relies on getting things right want to deflect as much as possible when that happens.Ok, why YOU thought that, but it was apparent no one else, who mattered, thought that. If he really was the best like you say, don't you wonder why he dropped?