The big thing with ranking prospects is that 10 years from now people wont even be able to agree on the order. There are objective truths, but also a lot of subjectivity. Two people can have the exact same projection for a player, but rank them very differently.
Yeah, absolutely. To me it's more about getting the general area of outcome right. For example - now that we are 8 years removed from the draft - Hayward or PG13? Different people can have different opinions. At 9-10 to me it doesn't really matter, if you liked either at that pick you will be good in the long term. The problem is if you consistently pick ... lets say Xavier Henry types ahead of those two.
bradley is a stiff and Clint never was. big difference
Is he thugh? look at Collins college career was vastly better even in year 1. Also the one Collins twin was a servicable starter. i dont ever see that with Bradley and no he is not more talented.
What? Bradley couldnt play because the roster is loaded at center, not because he is bad. The Collins were never serviceable starters. They were emergency starters in the era where teams still wanted statues for big men and they were still on the low end. If Bradley was in that era, he would be dominant.
