Of course. Symmetry is achieved with foundation, and adding blemishes does not add more symmetry (and even then, there is a history of adding asymmetry to make-up, such as beauty products).
And perception drives the sexual aspect of evolution much more than anything else. A more colorful male peacock is no more fertile than a less colorful one, but it's the one perceived by the female as being more desirable.
Sexual selection can indeed be a prominent force, and I'm glad to see you have abandoned the notion of equating make-up with fertility.
Now, let me ask you. In human society the world over, are younger women of a child bearing age considered more desirable than older women of child bearing age?
The context of the question made me think you feel the answer is obvious, but gosh, "the world over" is a big place. In every patriarchal society that I know of, men frequently (but certainly not universally) prefer younger women. Is that an attraction to those they can dominate? Why would this not be universal, if it were biologically driven? In matriarchal society, would older women prefer and bed younger men (for that matter, don't many do so now)? How do you separate power differential influences from sexual desirability in human behavior?
There are a lot of factors to consider before you can conclude that a sexually preferred mate age (or any other such characteristics) is directly related to fertility.
Pharyngula recently discussed this very notion in a post about the origin of breasts (there are not titillating pictures, but I am still not linking it directly):
Here’s another example of a fallacious interpretation. It’s from that infamous interview of Jordan Peterson with Vice.
There is so much wrong with so much of this interview, and I’m only picking on this one tiny part. But here are a few difficulties: red is a popular lipstick color, but how does he explain these other colors, which can also be quite attractive? What about the implicit racism in that claim — it’s a white trait to have a greater contrast in color between the lip and the face? What about the men — why do we have a *****-mimic between our nose and our chin?
Where is Peterson’s evidence? This is another example of the Desmond Morris effect: he simply asserts that his interpretation is the obvious one, therefore it must be true.
