The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

[JazzyFresh]

Whatever though Im off work now and got way better **** to do.

 

[JazzyFresh]

You asked what I would think if Warren was investigated for collusion with Russia, I laid out the things she would have to do, that Trump did, for such an investigation to be warranted.

At no point did the question of whether they were ultimately guilty of it come into consideration.

In short- FOH with your disingenuous ********. It's tiring, and you're making a fool of yourself.

Then don't answer me. Duh. By all means. Peace

 

[One Brow]

There's no push to drive fathers out of their home; there actually is a problem in the black community with that issue, which is self-inflicted. Creating jobs would help.

More criminal justice reform would help even more. The problem is not self-inflicted, nor inflicted by welfare policies, but by unfair incarceration policies.

 

[One Brow]

Here's my question, when Obama deported way more people than Trump where do you think he kept them? Holiday Inn?

He sent them back to their home countries. That's what "deport" means.

I want black people to thrive. They will not thrive by population control.

Having fewer children is a known, studied, certified means to being able to build wealth.

 

[One Brow]

So if someone makes up some false allegations that Warren colluded with Russia, you're ok with 3 years of investigations and 30+ million dollars wasted? As I've said nothing came out of that. Remember I'm talking about Warren and Collusion, not interference. Let's make that clear.

If Russia intervenes in our elections to support Warren, I want that to be investigated. If Warren obstructs justice by impeding that investigation, impeachment proceedings are warranted.

 

[One Brow]

Did Trump collude with Russia?

Yes or No?

No, but he obstructed justice to impede the investigation of his subordinates colluding with Russia.

Nixon didn't break into Democratic headquarters, either.

 

[JazzyFresh]

No, .

Thank you. Goodnight m

 

[One Brow]

Are you talking about the woman that is STILL trying to convince everyone that she has Indian ancestry even after every single one of her stories have been "ground into the dirt" disproven?

She does. She's about 1/32 Native American, the equivalent of a great-great-great-grandparent. It's less than she thought, but not non-existent.

 

[Harambe]

Yeah there's corruption on both parties. Hillary's team deleted emails and smashed phones. That is 100% fact. Now answer my question what crime did I say she was guilty of? Smashing phones and whitewashing emails. Which she did. No crime.

Cleared of mishandling classified information.

Suck it dude. You were wrong.

 

[One Brow]

What is Hillary guilty of? I really don't know. I've never said she's guilty of anything more than her employees smashing phones, and whitewashing hard drives which did happen. If I'm wrong by all means.

So, her aides are "guilty" of destroying Clinton's personal property, or Clinton is "guilty" of telling people to destroy her personal property? When did you become some Communist who thinks they can tell other people what to do with their property?

 

[One Brow]

Thank you. Goodnight m

I'm glad you agree Trump should be impeached for obstruction of justice. Good night.

 

[The Thriller]

I agree that it's insane how often you need to be corrected. Maybe don't be such an inaccurate poster and you wouldn't see that.

Like if you said there wasn't enough evidence found to convict Trump of collusion with Russia then I either wouldn't quote you or I would quote you and say I agree.
But you keep saying nothing happened from the Russia investigation. So I explain you are wrong.
Then you freak out and start playing the victim card.

It's insane

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

It’s why I have him on ignore. I’ve had more intellectually honest conversations with my garbage can than with @JazzyFresh. It’s the same damn schtick every single day with him:

1. He posts questions to instigate a bad faith argument.
2. He’s refuted.
3. He pretends to be ignorant and nonpartisan and asks for proof for questions that have been answered hundreds of times before. Often these answers are on the very thread page he’s writing on.
4. His ignorance is revealed by posters trying to educate him.
5. He gets all pissy and plays the victim card. He claims “he’s going to be the bigger person” and “steps away.”
6. He returns within 24 hours to repeat this whole process.

I don’t know why he does what he does. I’ve heard that trolls typically lack self-esteem and getting punked online gets them off? But I’m not a medical doctor so there’s no way for me to credibly speculate as to why he subjects us to his dog vomit every single day.

 

[Zombie]

 

[The Thriller]

Not to overshadow your bombshell, but this is concerning:

 

[The Thriller]

According to the article he’s:

The colonel, a Ukrainian-American immigrant who received a Purple Heart after being wounded in Iraq by a roadside bomb

So he sounds like the typical anti-American pro clinton deep stater.

“This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Colonel Vindman added, referring to Mr. Trump’s comments in the call.

Funny, not a single republican has brought this up. Probably because they know how damaging this is to our national security.

He will testify that he watched with alarm as “outside influencers” began pushing a “false narrative” about Ukraine that was counter to the consensus view of American national security officials, and harmful to United States interests. According to documents reviewed by The Times on the eve of his congressional testimony, Colonel Vindman was concerned as he discovered that Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, was leading an effort to prod Kiev to investigate Mr. Biden’s son, and to discredit efforts to investigate Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and his business dealings in Ukraine.

His account strongly suggests that he may have been among the aides the whistle-blower referred to in his complaint.

No one seems to refute the whistleblower’s complaint. It’s almost like it’s all true and very damning. Do republicans expect this to get better for them?

 

[The Thriller]

ummm

 

[Zombie]

ummm

Right on cue.

 

[Red]

Not sure if the Times article included NSC official Vindman's full opening statement. If not:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/28/politics/wh-ukraine-expert-opening-statement/index.html

 

[colton]

 

[The Thriller]

It’s interesting how Irma Grese on Fox News last night and now Fox News today (especially Fox n Friends) is spinning that because Vindman is Ukrainian (and Jewish) he cannot he trusted since he has divided loyalties. It’s almost like despite having served his country for his entire career and winning the Purple Heart, his loyalties are still “divided.”

Funny how this always seems to happen to critics of the president. Especially when they’re Jewish... why are right wingers always so angry at jews?