What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

No matter red, blue, socialist I don't wish impeachment on any elected official like you guys. What I would want is for my party to get the clue and work harder for me and become better. Look at your party... What have they done for you?
 
What people seem to be missing with Sondland is that the reason he claims he had to presume there was an improper quid pro quo was because he didn't see Trump's July 25th readout with Zelensky where he made that clear. His claim was during his work toward getting a meeting set up and the aid released, he came to presume there was a quid pro quo.

This has been shown to be a correct presumption based on the 25th of July phone call readout, as well as Trump's and Mulvaney's public statement since this all became public.

Great comment, Zombie-- thanks. I hadn't seen that broken down anywhere, and it totally clarifies the contradicting statements.
 
What people seem to be missing with Sondland is that the reason he claims he had to presume there was an improper quid pro quo was because he didn't see Trump's July 25th readout with Zelensky where he made that clear. His claim was during his work toward getting a meeting set up and the aid released, he came to presume there was a quid pro quo.

This has been shown to be a correct presumption based on the 25th of July phone call readout, as well as Trump's and Mulvaney's public statement since this all became public.

The guys slimey as ****. But best I can tell, he was doing everything he could to push the aid through. Dirty, but did his job. Acting in the best interest of both countries relations.

The fact that it took three attempts to just get him to say trump would benefit from an investigation into burisma(biden) is telling
 
What people seem to be missing with Sondland is that the reason he claims he had to presume there was an improper quid pro quo was because he didn't see Trump's July 25th readout with Zelensky where he made that clear. His claim was during his work toward getting a meeting set up and the aid released, he came to presume there was a quid pro quo.

This has been shown to be a correct presumption based on the 25th of July phone call readout, as well as Trump's and Mulvaney's public statement since this all became public.
He still presumed as of Wednesday... There was no "I presumed then but don't now" like you claim.
 
What people seem to be missing with Sondland is that the reason he claims he had to presume there was an improper quid pro quo was because he didn't see Trump's July 25th readout with Zelensky where he made that clear. His claim was during his work toward getting a meeting set up and the aid released, he came to presume there was a quid pro quo.

This has been shown to be a correct presumption based on the 25th of July phone call readout, as well as Trump's and Mulvaney's public statement since this all became public.
He also openly admitted he had no clue what Trump really wanted so he asked him. His answer? Trump said "he wanted nothing, he wanted Zelensky to do the right thing".

Care to explain?
 
It wasn't an insult. I was actually right that you wouldn't say a word about corruption against your own party. You're so quick to call it out against Trump but when an FBI agent allegedly lied to get the FISA warrant you don't say a word. It just shows you don't give a single damn about corruption. You don't...

You try to insult but no one here takes you seriously.

Haven't heard that one, but if an FBI officer lied, that is bad. Very bad. Bad FBI agent! I condemn you wholeheartedly if you lied. And if you lied you should be prosecuted and fired. Then join the Trump administration where you will fit right in with his cast of criminals. Haha.

You tend to ignore my anti-democrat posts, please try to pay attention. Thank you. : -)

And you keep spouting nonsense about what I give a damn about. You know as much about that as you do other things you write about.

Have a nice day, try to lighten up a bit, will you?
 
He also openly admitted he had no clue what Trump really wanted so he asked him. His answer? Trump said "he wanted nothing, he wanted Zelensky to do the right thing".

Care to explain?

Haha! This was after the quid pro quo happened, you nimrod. : - )

He got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and then said: "I don't want a cookie!"

It is also why the money was released. Trump was caught red handed and had no choice.
 
Last edited:
Haha! This was after the quid pro quo happened, you nimrod. : - )

He got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and then said: "I don't want a cookie!"
Lol putting words in his mouth, saying **** he never said. Then telling me to calm all while calling me names.


Awesome
 
Zombie, you're saying that call had quid pro quo(which transcripts prove you a liar) yet he had no clue what Trump really wanted thus finally had to ask Trump what he wanted and Trump told him he wanted nothing.

Its not rocket science. He presumed... Then he admitted his presumption was wrong once Trump told him he wanted "nothing".
 
Zombie, you're saying that call had quid pro quo(which transcripts prove you a liar) yet he had no clue what Trump really wanted thus finally had to ask Trump what he wanted and Trump told him he wanted nothing.

Its not rocket science. He presumed... Then he admitted his presumption was wrong once Trump told him he wanted "nothing".

That's about all your mind can take in at once, is what you're really trying to say. Nothing is that simple and the complexity of the situation evades you to the right and to the left. :(
 
That's about all your mind can take in at once, is what you're really trying to say. Nothing is that simple and the complexity of the situation evades you to the right and to the left. :(
Yeah insults are a sure sign of intelligence. The inability to conversate without them...

So explain. How does Sonland know there is Quid Pro Quo when he openly admits that he had no clue what Trump wanted and it was nothing more than a presumption? His own words.

Its pretty straight forward...
 
Last edited:
Yeah insults are a sure sign of intelligence. The inability to conversate without them...

So explain. How does Sonland know there is Quid Pro Quo when he openly admits that he had no clue what Trump wanted and it's nothing more than a presumption?

Its pretty straight forward...

Good insults are a sign of intelligence. Insults, on their own, aren't really related to intelligence at all to be clear. Inability to understand details and small events in the context of the aggregate are definitely a sign of lack of intelligence. You make your own conclusions.

I think at this point there's no amount of explaining to be done in your direction. Either you make an effort to listen in and respond in good faith or you shouldn't expect much. You keep accusing everybody else here of crazy ****, hypocritically. Everyone here engages in that here and there but you take it to the next level though. It'd be nice to see a good back and forth with points conceded, unfortunately that whole intelligence thing keeps getting in the way.

Nah,

Just keep yelling at everyone here for that paper with big red letters (written in blood, probably) that state "I, Donald Trump, am engaging in a QUID PRO QUO with you, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Investigate my political Rival's son, HUNTER BIDEN, so I can beat him in an American Election. In exchange, I will give you all that defense money, that you should have gotten weeks ago."
 
Ditto. The conservative, alt-left, Marxist.


You might as well be calling me a manatee.

you have been well trained by trump propaganda. lie over and over and over again. And you will find some low iq gullible people to believe you.

Vlad loves you, keep up the good work for the motherland, comrade.
 
Back
Top