What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Good insults are a sign of intelligence. Insults, on their own, aren't really related to intelligence at all to be clear. Inability to understand details and small events in the context of the aggregate are definitely a sign of lack of intelligence. You make your own conclusions.

I think at this point there's no amount of explaining to be done in your direction. Either you make an effort to listen in and respond in good faith or you shouldn't expect much. You keep accusing everybody else here of crazy ****, hypocritically. Everyone here engages in that here and there but you take it to the next level though. It'd be nice to see a good back and forth with points conceded, unfortunately that whole intelligence thing keeps getting in the way.

Nah,

Just keep yelling at everyone here for that paper with big red letters (written in blood, probably) that state "I, Donald Trump, am engaging in a QUID PRO QUO with you, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Investigate my political Rival's son, HUNTER BIDEN, so I can beat him in an American Election. In exchange, I will give you all that defense money, that you should have gotten weeks ago."
Lol good old self projection and hearsay.
 
Find me where in the transcripts Quid Pro Quo happened...

I've provided 5 witnesses who said it didn't.

People who did not witness something are not witnesses. They are irrelevant bystanders. You are trying to prove a negative, a fools errand.

Along those lines there are billions of people who did not witness the Charles Manson murders.
 
Just keep yelling at everyone here for that paper with big red letters (written in blood, probably) that state "I, Donald Trump, am engaging in a QUID PRO QUO with you, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Investigate my political Rival's son, HUNTER BIDEN, so I can beat him in an American Election. In exchange, I will give you all that defense money, that you should have gotten weeks ago."
It doesn't exist and you know it. You cant prove me wrong so get angry. Real angry.
 
And not a word... Proof that you guys don't give a damn about corruption. Not even a thought. More evidence that I'm right and you are wrong. I even quoted your Godly news source that you conveniently don't want to talk about...

Keep amassing your imaginary evidence. you'll change minds soon. LOL. Corruption? You clearly don't agree but that's exactly what we're supporting and advocating for in the impeachment inquiry. If you, like us, thought that Donald Trump may have done something, as an advocate for anti-corruption, you'd also be in support of this process.
 
People who did not witness something are not witnesses. They are irrelevant bystanders. You are trying to prove a negative, a fools errand.

Along those lines there are billions of people who did not witness the Charles Manson murders.
Agree. You are the ones trying to impeach off of bystanders accounts. We have the transcript. What you have is second and third hand accounts.
 
Keep amassing your imaginary evidence. you'll change minds soon. LOL. Corruption? You clearly don't agree but that's exactly what we're supporting and advocating for in the impeachment inquiry. If you, like us, thought that Donald Trump may have done something, as an advocate for anti-corruption, you'd also be in support of this process.
Angry and still not a word

Corruption though

And I don't care. I've stated that politicians are crooked on both parties numerous times. Its you who looks past one and cares about the other
 
Lol good old self projection and hearsay.

Words are difficult. huh?


It doesn't exist and you know it. You cant prove me wrong so get angry. Real angry.

I don't know that it doesn't exist.

There are two possible scenarios here:

1. It does exist in some form Or maybe some other type of damning evidence : Why on earth would Donald Trump and guilty parties allow this to get in the hands of anybody? In this instance

2. It doesn't exist : There should be evidence of its non-existence no? Seems like the white house would want to release all of his call transcripts and other records verbatim to prove that no foul play exists. Boldly clear your name Mr. President go ahead.

Non-cooperation on the part of the White House points to number 1. Just my thoughts here.
 
Angry and still not a word

Corruption though

And I don't care. I've stated that politicians are crooked on both parties numerous times. Its you who looks past one and cares about the other

Oh so its you who doesn't care about corruption. Nice

I'd like to see an investigation launched for all credible corruption allegations. I'm being honest here. I really don't like corruption. You think if all corruption is not investigated, none of it should be. That seems weird, and pretty unwise. I think expecting perfection in that sense might be a little unrealistic.
 
Agree. You are the ones trying to impeach off of bystanders accounts. We have the transcript. What you have is second and third hand accounts.

It's called an inquiry for a reason. Trying to gather evidence and make a decision on whether an impeachment is appropriate is what is happening.
 
Agree. You are the ones trying to impeach off of bystanders accounts. We have the transcript. What you have is second and third hand accounts.

You are arguing for innocence based on testimony from people who were not at the crime scene.
 
Yeah you're totally neutral. You're the one who's been taking part in a "Let's Impeach Trump" thread before any of this even happened. Lol definitely no ulterior motive behind you and all others...

I don't claim to be neutral, that's your pretense.
 
It wasn't an insult. I was actually right that you wouldn't say a word about corruption against your own party. You're so quick to call it out against Trump but when an FBI agent allegedly lied to get the FISA warrant you don't say a word. It just shows you don't give a single damn about corruption. You don't...

If an FBI (agent? lawyer? both?) lied, they should be punished just as harshly as we punish any other police officer/prosecutor for lying or making misleading statements. Heck, let's go even further and fine the guy a couple of dollars.

However, unless the FBI person received a personal benefit, that's not corruption.
 
But his testimony strikes me as someone 100% covering his own ***--

I got the same impression. I don't know what exactly he's covering up but he sure as hell acted like someone who is trying to weasel out of a bad situation before getting caught. I was going to mention that we'll probably see a Sondland investigation somewhere down the road.

Now I have to listen to his opening monologue again, because it sounded very damning the first go round.
 
Back
Top