The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Seems like he’s worried about losing a few senators and is tweeting to keep them in line
I’m going to put this one in a spoiler for graphic content:
Retired police officer (black) killed by a looter over TVs. For all the white people saying to just shut up and listen, and for failing to distinguish between protest and riot, or to even suggest its offensive and silencing to even make such a distinction, how many of these individuals is it appropriate to sacrifice to make that voice heard? Do we continue to conflate the protestors with the rioters/looters, because we need to understand that anger?
When we ‘understand’ the anger that fuels the violence, who are the victims?
Rest easy, David Dorn. I hope it's hard to sleep tonight for you virtue signalers condoning this ****.
I don't know what you just said.
Gotcha.Should have been "or" instead of "of".
I didn’t see any of the looters. But do you believe I have any supposition on the race of the looter, or care if they’re black or white?We should probably also separate the instigators looking to cause trouble or take advantage of chaos from the those who get angry, particularly when those who get angry at police over-reactions.
Did you notice this particular looter happened to be white?
I didn’t see any of the looters. But do you believe I have any supposition on the race of the looter, or care if they’re black or white?
My position is simple:
There’s a lot of peaceful protest and then there’s rioting and looting. From the get go, white people have come out defending and rationalizing the violence and destruction (and, in essence, inadvertently conflating it with protest). These arguments came under the idea of “understanding” what the violence is telling us, and also to not judge. [and as a side note, I’ve been the earliest and probably loudest voice saying that a lot of this probably isn’t caused by the black communities themselves]. I don’t speak for black people. But I am speaking on JFC, which is largely white, and that white census of our board (and the white census I’ve seen all over social media) is feeling it necessary to just “shut up and listen” and views being concerned about the violence as further evidence of white privileged. I believe this is because many white peoples have the underlying assumption that the violent blowback is going to be against white society, and a belief that ‘since we’ve dished it out, it’s appropriate for us to have a turn to take a small dose.’ But there’s a very ironic racism that underlies that, one that views African Americans as savages. And what all these white spokespeople for the black communities don’t understand is that this blowback, this violence, this destruction and death, is largely not going to be borne by the white community, so they are making no offer of sacrifice. The people affected by this are disproportionately black and minority communities. The jobs lost, the business destroyed that serve the community, and, yes, the people murdered.
So while one may believe it is the ultimate sign of contrition to extend “shut up and listen” to the violence, notice that their words are much more enabling than the words of so many black leaders, among them President Obama. And if the backdrop of everything is the inherent power and privilege of white America, what better way to facilitate further death and destruction than to have the white community “understand” the violence, and see more black homes destroyed, more black businesses going under, more black communities suffering, and more black people dying.
Do you see many people judging and pointing fingers at protestors? Or rioters/looters? Or are they the same? Is privilege the only explanation for being able to make such a distinction? Does not making a distinction have a cost? And, if so, who largely bears the burden of that cost?For my experience, I don’t see it as a “give and take” situation. I’m not that insecure with myself or my opinions. I have decided to listen to what protesters are saying and trying to listen and internalize. Not judge or point fingers. I can’t understand their experience. I try my best to listen and ask questions.
So you’re a small government kind of guy?Bottom line is police need to be heavily defunded.
If only there was still a party that believed in that...So you’re a small government kind of guy?
I wish, too. The best we can get is someone who nobody wants to work with, thus preventing the national-scale righting reflex that exacerbates so many of our problems through intervention, but satiates our appetite for feeling like we've "done something." In another thread HH mentioned Dennis Rodman running for president, and I was serious about saying I'd vote for that.If only there was still a party that believed in that...
Do you see many people judging and pointing fingers at protestors? Or rioters/looters? Or are they the same? Is privilege the only explanation for being able to make such a distinction? Does not making a distinction have a cost? And, if so, who largely bears the burden of that cost?
Bottom line is police need to be heavily defunded.
Well, you were responding to my post. Follow up clarity on whether you’re seeing people condemning protestors, as your response to me implied, seemed like a fair question to ask the person making the statement.Yer asking the wrong guy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's just that some people are more equal than others.Unfortunately, until a majority of white people acknowledge racism, better understand its cost to society, and want it to end, it will likely not end. I wish that wasn't the way it is going to have to happen, but it is. It is tough to find the line between being an ally and being in the way, but I hope we all try to find that balance.
I still do not understand how after millenia of existence, human beings are still collectively awful and cannot figure out how to function as a society of equals.