Obviously I know it. Despite teaching in a poor district the property taxes are high. Absurdly so. Like $10,000 on a $400,000 home. And we get a **** ton of funding from the state. Money has nothing to do with it. Should we be remote, every single student grades K-12 will have a laptop. The district will shell out money should Zoom or Screencastify not extend their free trials.
Now so far as poverty level goes, yes. But that has nothing to do with the quality of education. Kids flourish in all areas. We have some brilliant kids. But most of them have an infrastructure in place at home to succeed. Hence my original statement of it all come back to the parents.
First, there are many studies that "white" schools get more funding than "black" schools.
Brookings Review article by Linda Darling-Hammond (Spring 1998)
www.brookings.edu
I believe money helps, but is not a "fix". The problem is, poor parents, that had poor parents that never emphasized schooling (and probably didn't have the education to help there kids with school). It is perpetual cycle, and one of the main reasons poor stay oppressed. Due to the systemic issues discussed in this thread, this has had a large impact on the black communities in this country. There is no easy fix. Additionally, many east coast schools that are "flush" with cash, waste money on too much administration. It happens everywhere, but is worse on the east coast. Utah does it, but not to the same extent as they have to be efficient with their funding. I believe Utah is ranked 49 or 50 in funds per student, but the test scores (whole other bias issue there) and graduation rates are very high, largely due to parent involvement, which again, are better educated themselves.
DC put a ****-ton of money into schools when former NBAer Kevin Johnson's wife Michelle Rhee was in charge of the DC schools, which are abysmal. The influx of money made no change.
As crazy as it sounds, we almost need to provide a welfare subsidy to poor, uneducated parents based on their kids attending and graduating. Or even better, pay them to finish school (with attendance requirements to receive pay, etc.)with better income, which means they will rely less on welfare and likely become tax payers themselves. And it may also make sense to allow alternative high schools to allow people to pursue a trade in high school, as not everyone desires to, or is built to go to college. Lets make the system work better. When I was in high school, we had an alternative place we could go for some credits where you can take autobody, auto mechanics, welding, etc. It should be part of the curriculum everywhere.
Currently just under 50% of households in the U.S. pay federal income tax. We should work to better educate/train our population. There has to be something to stop the perpetual cycle. And finding a fix will be good for all of us, and it will better educate upcoming and future generations, which will provide these families, and allow them to be net providers and not net takers.