If he was there I take him just so I can flip him to OKC for multiple assets.
I think he goes top 16.
Imagine a 7-foot Chandler Parsons. I'd trade up for him, tbh.
If he was there I take him just so I can flip him to OKC for multiple assets.
I think he goes top 16.
Zeke might play some 4... the shot might be good enough and he has gotten himself into amazing shape.
If we draft him DL will mention 1200 times that he plays the piano and DM plays the drums... he always latches on to weird ****... so from then on it will be the balance beam, hand pads, and he was top of the class at band camp.
I feel like Precious Achuwia is a decently safe answer to this question.Who will the Rockets consider now that they own #16 ?
huh?? no... This type of categorical labeling doesnt make any sense..If you think Jalen Smith can play at the 4, you kind of have to give the same benefit of the doubt to Nnaji. The idea is that he'd give the Jazz a big, mobile defender who can also space the floor and play backup 5. So the Jazz would bring him in to replace Derrick Favors' role. That said, it's in the same vein as Jarrell Brantley and Juwan Morgan. So the question is how much better Nnaji is going to be.
Also Reggie Perry isnt near the shooter as Nnaji.If you think Jalen Smith can play at the 4, you kind of have to give the same benefit of the doubt to Nnaji. The idea is that he'd give the Jazz a big, mobile defender who can also space the floor and play backup 5. So the Jazz would bring him in to replace Derrick Favors' role. That said, it's in the same vein as Jarrell Brantley and Juwan Morgan. So the question is how much better Nnaji is going to be.
FWIW, I still think Reggie Perry is more offensively skilled than Nnaji, but the risk with Perry is that he plays defense as an afterthought. Nnaji is a disciplined defender. He'll dig in and do the dirty work that Favors used to do. He's got good size at 6'10" w/ a 7'2" wingspan.
I actually kinda like him... he's fluid and if he shoots it well he could be the 4/5 type guy we need to space. I'm in here.
I'd say its a medium if since he shot free throws well and his form on the 15 foot pick and pop looks pretty pure. He seems like a workers so I think its a fair projection.A big if since he didn’t do it in games.
Your inclinations are several years behind. You think Utah's gonna send a message to their $100MM+ player in his prime with a $2MM 1st rd pick? That adds up in your mind as a plausible scenario?Certainly, I think it sends a significant message if the Jazz draft a clear big with their first-rounder: negotiations with Gobert ain't going totally swimmingly.
Zeke would be a good hedge IF he can play 4. Since that is something we can't know yet then, well, I don't know.
In any case, the Jazz's abject inability to address the 4-spot since Millsap left has held them back, IMO. So I'm about figuring it out. It's a big reason why I like Woodard.
huh?? no... This type of categorical labeling doesnt make any sense..
The guy who averaged less than a block a game playing C in over 30MPG is as versatile a defender as Jalen Smith? no.... that doesnt make any sense... why would it?Zeke Nnaji is at least as mobile and versatile a defender as Jalen Smith is out on the floor. Make sense yet?
Perry shot more 3s and shot them better than Nnaji did. Perry also projects to be the better shooter. The expectation is that Nnaji will be able to extend his range and stretch the floor, but he hasn't done it yet.Also Reggie Perry isnt near the shooter as Nnaji.