That joke isn't funny anymore. If it's not a joke, it's even worse.Idaho is establishing death panels because their hospitals are so overwhelmed. I don’t understand why the unvaccinated aren’t just turned away.
Too bad write4u/EenieMeenie never found out. Would you believe he started emailing me during his timeout, as if I'd want to have a conversation with him? I'm pretty sure he was hoping I'd confirm his fiction was true.One Brow is my alt confirmed
I'm so sorry to hear that. I hope everything goes well.My daughter, who couldn't get vaccinated because of a pre-existing heart condition, tested positive today. She was exposed by a co-worker that refused to get vaccinated. Myself, my wife, another daughter, her husband and my 2 year old grandson now need to get tested as we were all together Sunday night. I also was at my parent's house last night. Both have severe health issues. Calling them tonight to tell them I had possibly been exposed was not a fun call. What a **** show.
90% of the time (as advertised) in the under 50% that are fully vaccinated.So the vaccine stops the virus?
When less than half are fully vaccinated? Unlikely.It seems like cases should be going down not up but ok.
Measles full vaccination rate is around 90%, instead of 50%.The measles vaccine is 97% effective at prevention... People are getting infected at high rates with the covid vaccine.
As opposed to 3 for measles? 3 shots mean effective, 4 means ineffective?How many shots you suppose you need? I'm hearing at least 4 due to ineffectiveness.
If covid19 mutates as much as the flu does, than maybe so.Then your flu and covid twice a year.
You can get the J&J shot and be done, or if you have the full 3 weeks then you can get the Pfizer on your first day in-country and the second shot the day you leave. As far as I know all vaccination cites are connected to the CDC who keeps tracks of who has been vaccinated when. The CDC enforces the 21-day interval between the Pfizer shots. Moderna has a 4 week interval so that is out unless you are giving the vaccination cites a fake name.I'll have to get more info. I'm not sure what the testing is like but one of the tests you take returning to China shows up positive for 3 weeks with mrna testing, according to reports here. But that might just be bad information. Either way I'm only in the USA for 2-3 weeks so I can get both shots in that time likely. Plus I'll most likely get flu like symptoms and they won't let me on the flight with a fever or other symptoms even with a negative test. Or worse I'll have those symptoms arriving in China and I'll go straight to the hospital for at least 3
weeks, then get cleared a have to do 2-3 strict quarantine.
I'll have to get more info. I'm not sure what the testing is like but one of the tests you take returning to China shows up positive for 3 weeks with mrna testing, according to reports here. But that might just be bad information. Either way I'm only in the USA for 2-3 weeks so I can get both shots in that time likely. Plus I'll most likely get flu like symptoms and they won't let me on the flight with a fever or other symptoms even with a negative test. Or worse I'll have those symptoms arriving in China and I'll go straight to the hospital for at least 3
weeks, then get cleared a have to do 2-3 strict quarantine.
Possibility of cardiomyopathy after being vaccinated.What about the vaccine makes it a risk for people with pre-existing heart conditions?
Well, that is scary. Are the risks of getting cardiomyopathy greater with the vaccine than for someone that gets Covid? Are the risks the same with all 3 approved shots? Seems like a rock and a hard place type situation. Sorry again you are dealing with it. I hope your daughter is doing well.Possibility of cardiomyopathy after being vaccinated.
You thought it was a joke? I thought it was a pretty accurate description of what Idaho is doing. Why do you find it's inaccurate? And I absolutely support overwhelmed ICUs turning away sick unvaccinated patients. At this point, they've chosen their fate. Do you disagree with this? Why would you think this was humorous? Have I made jokes in the past about killing off sick people? Have I been one throughout the last two years to find enjoyment with this pandemic?That joke isn't funny anymore. If it's not a joke, it's even worse.
![]()
You will develop antibodies, but shoulf not have false positives.
Yes, strongly. It's bad for the community to release the most infectious back into it. It's bad for the medical conscience to set standards about who does and does not deserve care. It's bad for public health policy to say some people don't deserve to be treated.And I absolutely support overwhelmed ICUs turning away sick unvaccinated patients. At this point, they've chosen their fate. Do you disagree with this?
I did not think you would be so callous and careless.Why would you think this was humorous?
This policy would hurt more people than the unvaccinated.I just hope these people bear the brunt of these consequences and not the vaccinated folks who are merely trying to protect themselves and their families.
I just brought up the fact that the flu season was very mild, at the time so many Americans were wearing masks and practicing social distancing, as suggesting those practices might have helped tamp down the flu, and, IF that were the case, would it really be unreasonable to think masking and social distancing helped where Covid spread was concerned as well?I am not saying you personally are doing all of the things, and I am not crediting you personally with making the flu season mild. I feel we are missing each other because the scope keeps switching. If we are talking about what you do yourself to lower your own risk of COVID exposure, then okay. If we are talking about aggregate societal observations or actions, then that is okay too. It is the mixing of the two that I am having trouble keeping straight.
I disagree. Those who are seriously ill with covid and have refused the vaccine should not be hospitalized at the expense of those who need operations/health care and have become vaccinated. They've had months to get vaccinated and those who have put off important medical operations and/or those who are vaccinated and need treatment should not be sacrificed for those who have acted irresponsibly during this pandemic. Freedom has consequences.Yes, strongly. It's bad for the community to release the most infectious back into it. It's bad for the medical conscience to set standards about who does and does not deserve care. It's bad for public health policy to say some people don't deserve to be treated.
I did not think you would be so callous and careless.
This policy would hurt more people than the unvaccinated.
That is not correct. Miocarditis and pericarditis are described as rare complications after mRNA vaccines - cardiomyopathy though is completely different and unrelated condition.Possibility of cardiomyopathy after being vaccinated.
Your position would spread those consequences to those who did not make the decision.I disagree. Those who are seriously ill with covid and have refused the vaccine should not be hospitalized at the expense of those who need operations/health care and have become vaccinated. They've had months to get vaccinated and those who have put off important medical operations and/or those who are vaccinated and need treatment should not be sacrificed for those who have acted irresponsibly during this pandemic. Freedom has consequences.
"I did not think you would be so callous and careless." I'm not sure why you think that is opaque.Also I didn't quite understand your response, why did you think I was joking originally? I could use some clarification.
Are the non-N95 masks really as useless as you seem to suggest they are? That’s all I’ve been trying to puzzle out.
The study didn't break out the rate for kids, but going by the earlier study in the pre-Delta era, the protection provided to kids from cloth masks is less than 3%.The study linked surgical masks with an 11% drop in risk, compared with a 5% drop for cloth.
Yes, the cloth masks seem to be the least effective.![]()
Face masks for COVID pass their largest test yet
A rigorous study finds that surgical masks are highly protective, but cloth masks fall short.www.nature.com
The study didn't break out the rate for kids, but going by the earlier study in the pre-Delta era, the protection provided to kids from cloth masks is less than 3%.
Also, that teacher may have occasionally removed his mask but that school is a mask mandate school. The teacher and students were masked all the time, or nearly all of the time.