You keep making this strawman that tanking means we have to have a bottom 3 recordYall really think we can be as ****** as the Hornets were this year and teh FO is masterminding that ****?
You keep making this strawman that tanking means we have to have a bottom 3 recordYall really think we can be as ****** as the Hornets were this year and teh FO is masterminding that ****?
I have never said we would be awful next year. Im also the first person to make a wrong prediction about the Jazz being bad from last season.Remember Cy is the dude that saw our roster last year and projected us to be awful. We can't even see the roster yet and he thinks we very well could be awful.
Nope sir... I'm making the math argument that if we lose 9 more games than last year that is the same amount of games the Hornets won this year. If you don't think 36-9-27 then please explain math to me.You keep making this strawman that tanking means we have to have a bottom 3 record
Mmm… IDK. Depends on how it shakes out. If Utah is hanging around 10th worst record, I could see them tanking down the stretch to keep the pick.I guess it's possible we could end up with a worse record next season if we keep mostly the same roster we have right now and add 3 rookies and let them play a ton of minutes next season. But I definitely don't think we're going to intentionally tank. Whatever the roster ends up looking like, I think the front office will just let them go out and try to win and whatever happens, happens.
The Jazz tried to win games this year as well before pushing the tank forward. I think we are going to have a very similar mindset unless things really line up in our favor in free agency.Mmm… IDK. Depends on how it shakes out. If Utah is hanging around 10th worst record, I could see them tanking down the stretch to keep the pick.
That being said, it’s time to actually try to win games next year and I think the Jazz win ~47 games.
You either listen to the dude who was wrong about the W/L or you listen to the guy who thought trading for THT was a down payment.Remember Cy is the dude that saw our roster last year and projected us to be awful. We can't even see the roster yet and he thinks we very well could be awful.
Which teams have injuries next year?Who are the Jazz for sure leapfrogging in the standings next season?
Ummmmm which players are we trading? We offloaded Mike, Don, Rudy, Bogey, Vando, Beasley... we trading Sexton (who didn't play a ton anyway), KO, THT? Don't think there is a lot of lever to pull unless its guys we sign or trade for this offseason.My take that the Jazz will be in the top 10 of the lottery next season mostly has to due with the fact that I just dont think they are ready to take that next step. Maybe we start off strong, or we go on a run at some point that puts us in that 6-10 seed range, but towards the trade deadline the FO will do the same thing they did this year. They will consolidate the roster down to the players they see as long-term pieces and they will pull at the tank lever.
Are injuries turned off next year?Nearly every team ahead of us in the standings had significant injuries throughout the season. A lot of the reason the Jazz overachieved relative to everyone else this past season was because the Jazz managed to stay very healthy while the rest of the league really struggled with injuries.
What if they get better? What if one of the rookies we have is a top 7-8 his rookie year? What if the $50M in space yields a good rotation player.Hopefully Lauri is better next year, but I think next season will be another year of development for him as far as the Jazz continuing to try and test his limits as a higher usage go to scorer. Maybe they try to put the ball in Kessler's hands more as far as decision making and post play/jump shooting. Maybe they try to put the ball in Ochai's hand more. Maybe Dunn/THT arent who they showed in latter half of the season.
A slight step back of 2-3 games is not what Locke or most are referring to. I wouldn't even call that a step back as wins/losses can change based on record in close games. Pitching the idea of tanking our way to the 8-10 spot in the lotto as part of the plan is pretty wild imo. We may end up there... but that isn't the plan... and that isn't how the FO will move this summer. If we end up there its because we were hit by injuries and our offseason was bad.Overall I just think there are more opportunities for a slight step back than a big enough step forward to warrant the FO not pulling some tank strings.
Mmm… IDK. Depends on how it shakes out. If Utah is hanging around 10th worst record, I could see them tanking down the stretch to keep the pick.
That being said, it’s time to actually try to win games next year and I think the Jazz win ~47 games.
Jesus christ dude. No one here is David Locke. Who is most? Who has even said an actual W/L number?A slight step back of 2-3 games is not what Locke or most are referring to. I wouldn't even call that a step back as wins/losses can change based on record in close games. Pitching the idea of tanking our way to the 8-10 spot in the lotto as part of the plan is pretty wild imo. We may end up there... but that isn't the plan... and that isn't how the FO will move this summer. If we end up there its because we were hit by injuries and our offseason was bad.
And that's the most likely scenario.Yeah...in that scenario I could see them tanking the last few weeks of the season, and it would be the right call.
I mean... we did a second deal with the Lakers... didn't we?You either listen to the dude who was wrong about the W/L or you listen to the guy who thought trading for THT was a down payment.
Or you could listen to the person who is making actual points.I mean... we did a second deal with the Lakers... didn't we?
It isn't as crazy as thinking Walker Kessler should go to the G League or that Tony Bradley was a poor mans Aldridge...
The other angle here is that having one top-10 pick in ‘24 and two 1sts in ‘25 >>> zero picks in ‘24 and three (likely non-lottery) picks in ‘25.Yeah...in that scenario I could see them tanking the last few weeks of the season, and it would be the right call.
And factor in this might be the last chance Utah can get a top 10 pick.The other angle here is that having one top-10 pick in ‘24 and two 1sts in ‘25 >>> zero picks in ‘24 and three (likely non-lottery) picks in ‘25.
Or that Jonas Valanciunas would be a fiery Pau Gasol.I mean... we did a second deal with the Lakers... didn't we?
It isn't as crazy as thinking Walker Kessler should go to the G League or that Tony Bradley was a poor mans Aldridge...