I'm not a particular fan of them but I believe Obama is a US citizen and the US is not responsible for 9/11. I am sure somewhere along those lines those people started hating the US for something but they are still responsible for their own actions.
American Citizen Sentenced to Death in Iran
- Thread starter TheDude
- Start date
I'm not a particular fan of them but I believe Obama is a US citizen and the US is not responsible for 9/11. I am sure somewhere along those lines those people started hating the US for something but they are still responsible for their own actions.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
well actually i believe that USA should repay what they destroyed. because they did not find any wmd's. rebuild what they destroyed.
if on the other hand they invaded found a ****load of nukes etc take the nukes destroy the country some more. then leave.
If your serious about the bottom of your post, then you would definitely be in line with mainstream politicians.
Congrats.
DutchJazzer
Banned
lol no not serious about the 2nd part hence the smiley.
but the first part i'm real serious. they destroyed a "innocent" country in search for non existent wmd's. so yeah i think they should rebuild. and apologize maybe.
but they won't apologize because sadam and friends did other kinds of horrible things.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Yeah I got ya.
Well I've seen no evidence of a United States birth certificate from him, other than the obviously faked one that was released awhile ago.
I've researched 9/11 in depth for quite a few years now, and I doubt we will ever know who was completely responsible.
What is absolutely obvious though, is that it was not Osama Bin Laden, Al' Queda, or the Taliban.
From the evidence that I've seen, the money points back to Israelli intelligence and the Pakistani I.S.I.
Now from what the 9/11 commission report said, and from what the evidence points to.... the United States was obviously involved in covering up information. Were they involved in the attack? Who knows....
You do understand that Irag DID have WMDs at one point. They used WMDs against Iran and innocent women and children inside Iraq and refused to cooperate with inspections that were intended to assure teh rest of the world that they no longer had WMDs, right?
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Yeah I do agree with this.
If this country actually practiced what our forefathers have preached in the constitution, and their numerous peaceful quotes.... then maybe this would happen.
It's obvious the United States will never apologize for anything, or do anything good for any country.... including themselves.
I'm speaking strictly of our government of course.
DutchJazzer
Banned
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
The only weapons that Iraq ever possessed that were even close to military grade, were the weapons given to the "Mujahideen" in the 80's to fight up against soviet Russia.
Of course we all know the Mujahideen later became Al' Queda, and were blamed for the attacks on 9/11.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Yeah it shouldn't be too surprising.
Just look at the obvious assassinations of the 60's.
Proof that Iraq used chemical weapons? I'll grab some links, but I'm baffled that people see the latest installment of the Persian Gulf conflict as a stand alone event.
https://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/chemical_warfare_iran_iraq_war.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack
After the '92 Gulf War Iraq absolutely had largestock piles of chemical weapons. The UN set out to destroy and verify the destruction of these weapons. In '98 Clinton withdrew investigators because they were being prevented from investigating sites of interest. Clinton then lobbed a couple cruise missiles at Iraq and the UN impossed tougher sanctions that led to the the death of innocent Iraqi women and children while doing nothing about Saddam's regime or further verification that Iraq's chemical weapons had benn destroyed. This left the door open for Bush jr. to invade in 2003. It didn't help that Saddam bluffed that he still had chemical weapons in order to prevent an Iranian invasion.
Do you not consider chemical weapons to be WMDs?
I think you meant Afghanistan, not Iraq.
He doesn't even understand that Star Trek isn't real.
DutchJazzer
Banned
what star trek isnt real? then why do i have a stardate calender widget on my desktop?
all these star dates wasted. nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
my life is now useless
It always was. The only difference is that now you realised it. JK
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
This man won't be killed. He'll just be used as a bargaining chip to get Iran more money, foreign "aid", flex their muscles in front of their media.
well actually i believe that USA should repay what they destroyed. because they did not find any wmd's. rebuild what they destroyed.
if on the other hand they invaded found a ****load of nukes etc take the nukes destroy the country some more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ882QYzr-M
https://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/01/10/us-navy-rescues-distressed-iranians-at-sea-for-second-time/
We rescued a second group when the Iranians have told us to not even be there. HAHA
We rescued a second group when the Iranians have told us to not even be there. HAHA