What's new

2024 annual Jazzfanz All time jazz draft

He drafted Hayward when there are still a ton of players way better than him then put him in his starting lineup. It amuses me.

You thought unskilled stiff Mark Eaton was a good pick. Maybe you're just not very bright, hmmmm?

I created a great team with no glaring weaknesses. They can playmake, shoot, defend, and have lethal weapons on both ends in the starting lineup, and on the bench.

Best team in the competition tbh
 
Hayward is a damn good fit with any starting lineup.
It’s true. It’s just a little thin. Like, you could say the same about Joe Ingles but are we really stretching the argument that far?

I appreciate the stones. But he probably could’ve waited another round or two.
 
You thought unskilled stiff Mark Eaton was a good pick. Maybe you're just not very bright, hmmmm?

I created a great team with no glaring weaknesses. They can playmake, shoot, defend, and have lethal weapons on both ends in the starting lineup, and on the bench.

Best team in the competition tbh
You’ve been the clear frontrunner since starting with Lebron/Robinson/Nash.
 
It’s true. It’s just a little thin. Like, you could say the same about Joe Ingles but are we really stretching the argument that far?

I appreciate the stones. By he probably could’ve waited another round or two.

Hayward was about as good as Paul George before his injury. People just quickly forget.
 
It’s true. It’s just a little thin. Like, you could say the same about Joe Ingles but are we really stretching the argument that far?

I appreciate the stones. By he probably could’ve waited another round or two.
Prime Hayward and Ingles aren't even remotely in the same ball park though. Ath this point most people have their stars so they are looking for the best complimentary guys and Hayward fits that criteria to a T. He wasn't amazing at anything but was good at everything.
 
Prime Hayward and Ingles aren't even remotely in the same ball park though. Ath this point most people have their stars so they are looking for the best complimentary guys and Hayward fits that criteria to a T. He wasn't amazing at anything but was good at everything.
Sure.
 
He’s not a bad player. But there are much better options and for the record I love his team, but it’s odd to me he’d draft him with intent to start him. Far better options were/are available and I’d also say that Paul George is always way over drafted in these. I would never start him in this. He’s way overrated imo
 
He’s not a bad player. But there are much better options and for the record I love his team, but it’s odd to me he’d draft him with intent to start him. Far better options were/are available and I’d also say that Paul George is always way over drafted in these. I would never start him in this. He’s way overrated imo
Give me the list of long, insanely athletic 6’ 8”+ dudes that, when healthy
-are perennial all-defensive players (and can switch across 4 positions)
-sharpshooters on high volume
-can play as the 1st option/primary ball-handler (and aren’t an absolute black hole)
-can play just as well or better off the ball

I can think of between one and three other players that might meet that criteria and they were all off the board by pick 20.
 
Last edited:
I hate my team feel free to make fun of it all you want.

The more I play the more I'm way out of my depth. I am not near the historian of the sport that you guys are. I also just don't put the necessary amount of thought into it. Should probably sit it out going forward.
 
Give me the list of long, insanely athletic 6’ 8”+ dudes that, when healthy
-are perennial all-defensive players (and can switch across 4 positions)
-sharpshooters on high volume
-can play as the 1st option/primary ball-handler (and aren’t an absolute black hole)
-can play just as well or better off the ball

I can think of between one and three other players that might meet that criteria and they were all off the board by pick 20.
I’d be happy to make a list but why do they have to have specific dimensions? Also he was never an elite defender above average yes, and he was never on any all defensive teams. He was a #1 option because we didn’t have better options on offense. Lots of guys can handle the ball doesn’t make them all world.
 
I’d be happy to make a list but why do they have to have specific dimensions? Also he was never an elite defender above average yes, and he was never on any all defensive teams. He was a #1 option because we didn’t have better options on offense. Lots of guys can handle the ball doesn’t make them all world.
Pardon me, but pffffffffffff. He made four all-defensive teams. It’s not easy to make them, especially as a a prominent offensive player.

I listed those qualifications for a reason, and they aren’t arbitrary. If you have trouble making a list then that underscores the point.

He is of an extremely rare and very useful (critical?) archetype for team-building at the highest levels, such as a competition like this. If anything, he doesn’t get enough credit because of weird rivalry crap and that he has trouble staying healthy.
 
Pardon me, but pffffffffffff. He made four all-defensive teams. It’s not easy to make them, especially as a a prominent offensive player.

I listed those qualifications for a reason, and they aren’t arbitrary. If you have trouble making a list then that underscores the point.

He is of an extremely rare and very useful (critical?) archetype for team-building at the highest levels, such as a competition like this. If anything, he doesn’t get enough credit because of weird rivalry crap and that he has trouble staying healthy.
I think Thee is still talking about Hayward and didnt notice that previous post was about George.
 
I think Thee is still talking about Hayward and didnt notice that previous post was about George.
I would hope he would know I wasn’t talking about Hayward since Hayward isn’t one of the four people that belong in the class (Lebron, Durant, Kawhi, Paul George) but you’re probably right and I definitely should’ve specified.
 
Back
Top