What's new

Why is it ok for Democrat "Extremist", especially the ones here to openly advocate for assassination of Presidents?

SteakNEggs

Well-Known Member
After the second attempt and posters here literally advocating to murder a Presidential candidate without a single warning I'm just curious why that was allowed after the first attempt. I'm not here to troll but it baffles me that this dangerous and hate filled rhetoric was openly supported here. Don't you think openly supporting violence and very very dangerous diatribe and openly advocating for death is ok? They didn't even get a warning or anything. Dies JF openly support this kind of rhetoric?

If I get in trouble, so be it but I feel posters here literally advocating for the assassination of a political opponent is wrong and find in insulting that they got away with it. No matter the candidate.. no matter the party it should be shinned and stopped.. I can provide the evidence if needed.
 
Last edited:
The 2nd assassin spews the same hateful and bigoted conspiracies and bigotry that is openly spouted here. These people point the finger at everyone else yet their rhetoric is leading to assassination attempts and violence. How can any of you point at others when you openly supported murder?

It's just mine boggling that "fight like hell" and the pro murder crowd haven't shut up about it for 4 years. Yet Biden says "time to put Trump in the bullseye" and what do Democrats say?
RIP, nice try. Invest in a better gun next time.
Cy is here openly getting off on someone trying to assassinate... literal MURDER....and he's heralded as a hero around here.
 
NEW: Donald Trump said there could be political violence if he loses in November.

Time: “Donald Trump Says Political Violence ‘Depends’ on ‘Fairness’ of 2024 Election”

Edward-Isaac Dovere, CNN: “Many people have lost American presidential elections over the last 230 years – Trump is the only one to say about violence if he loses ‘it depends.’”

Shane Goldmacher, New York Times: “Trump does not dismiss the possibility of political violence around the election. ‘If we don’t win, you know, it depends,’ he tells TIME. ‘It always depends on the fairness of the election.’”

Trump also continued to praise and promise pardons for violent January 6 rioters – who he calls “hostages” and “patriots.”


Time: “Trump also tells TIME he might pardon the more than 800 men and women charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack, most of whom have pleaded guilty. The assault left more than 140 law enforcement officers injured and sent lawmakers into hiding. More than 120 people have been accused of using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury to an officer, and members of extremist groups were found guilty of seditious conspiracy.

“Trump has sought to recast the insurrectionist riot as an act of patriotism. ‘I call them the J-6 patriots,’ Trump tells TIME. When asked whether he would consider pardoning every one of them, he says: ‘Yes, absolutely.’”

Washington Post: “Former president Donald Trump on Thursday praised and embraced a woman convicted of defying police orders on the U.S. Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021. … Trump has steadily escalated his advocacy for people charged in the Capitol riot, including by pledging to pardon them if he returns to the White House, praising them as patriots, participating in a recording with Jan. 6 prisoners singing the national anthem, and playing it at his first rally of the 2024 campaign last month.”

The Hill: “Trump describes imprisoned Jan. 6 rioters as ‘hostages’”

Washington Post: “Trump vows pardons, government apology to Capitol rioters if elected”

NBC News: “Former President Donald Trump promised Wednesday night that if he is elected he will pardon a ‘large portion’ of the people convicted of federal offenses for their participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.”

Trump: “January 6, it was the largest crowd I’ve ever spoken to. And they were there proud, they were there with love in their heart. That was an unbelievable — and it was a beautiful day.”

Business Insider: “Then-President Donald Trump didn’t want to specifically call for the Justice Department to prosecute January 6 rioters or forcefully condemn those who stormed the Capitol as unrepresentative of the MAGA movement.”

NBC News: “Trump spoke at a fundraiser for Jan. 6 defendants”

Trump is only ramping up his extreme and dangerous rhetoric – he has already promised a “bloodbath” if he loses this election and vowed to be a “dictator on day one” if he wins.

NBC News: “Trump says there will be a ‘bloodbath’ if he loses the election”

Rolling Stone: “Trump Says There Will Be a ‘Bloodbath’ and Elections Will End if He Isn’t Reelected”

New York Times: “Trump Defends His Warning of a ‘Blood Bath for the Country’”

The Atlantic: “Trump Says He’ll Be a Dictator on ‘Day One’”

Associated Press: “Trump declines to rule out abusing power to seek retribution if he returns to the White House”

Washington Post: “Trump calls political enemies ‘vermin,’ echoing dictators Hitler, Mussolini”

The Guardian: “Donald Trump says he will lock up his political enemies if he is president again.”

Forbes: “Trump said of his relationships with dictators, ‘the tougher and meaner they are, the better I get along with them,’ which he insisted is ‘not a bad thing.’

“‘The easy ones,’ Trump said, referring to America’s allies, ‘I maybe don’t like as much or don’t get along with as much.’”

The Atlantic: “Late Friday night, the former president of the United States—and a leading candidate to be the next president—insinuated that America’s top general deserves to be put to death. That extraordinary sentence would be unthinkable in any other rich democracy. But Donald Trump, on his social-media network, Truth Social, wrote that Mark Milley’s phone call to reassure China in the aftermath of the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was ‘an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH.’”
 
NEW: Donald Trump said there could be political violence if he loses in November.

Time: “Donald Trump Says Political Violence ‘Depends’ on ‘Fairness’ of 2024 Election”

Edward-Isaac Dovere, CNN: “Many people have lost American presidential elections over the last 230 years – Trump is the only one to say about violence if he loses ‘it depends.’”

Shane Goldmacher, New York Times: “Trump does not dismiss the possibility of political violence around the election. ‘If we don’t win, you know, it depends,’ he tells TIME. ‘It always depends on the fairness of the election.’”

Trump also continued to praise and promise pardons for violent January 6 rioters – who he calls “hostages” and “patriots.”


Time: “Trump also tells TIME he might pardon the more than 800 men and women charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack, most of whom have pleaded guilty. The assault left more than 140 law enforcement officers injured and sent lawmakers into hiding. More than 120 people have been accused of using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury to an officer, and members of extremist groups were found guilty of seditious conspiracy.

“Trump has sought to recast the insurrectionist riot as an act of patriotism. ‘I call them the J-6 patriots,’ Trump tells TIME. When asked whether he would consider pardoning every one of them, he says: ‘Yes, absolutely.’”

Washington Post: “Former president Donald Trump on Thursday praised and embraced a woman convicted of defying police orders on the U.S. Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021. … Trump has steadily escalated his advocacy for people charged in the Capitol riot, including by pledging to pardon them if he returns to the White House, praising them as patriots, participating in a recording with Jan. 6 prisoners singing the national anthem, and playing it at his first rally of the 2024 campaign last month.”

The Hill: “Trump describes imprisoned Jan. 6 rioters as ‘hostages’”

Washington Post: “Trump vows pardons, government apology to Capitol rioters if elected”

NBC News: “Former President Donald Trump promised Wednesday night that if he is elected he will pardon a ‘large portion’ of the people convicted of federal offenses for their participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.”

Trump: “January 6, it was the largest crowd I’ve ever spoken to. And they were there proud, they were there with love in their heart. That was an unbelievable — and it was a beautiful day.”

Business Insider: “Then-President Donald Trump didn’t want to specifically call for the Justice Department to prosecute January 6 rioters or forcefully condemn those who stormed the Capitol as unrepresentative of the MAGA movement.”

NBC News: “Trump spoke at a fundraiser for Jan. 6 defendants”

Trump is only ramping up his extreme and dangerous rhetoric – he has already promised a “bloodbath” if he loses this election and vowed to be a “dictator on day one” if he wins.

NBC News: “Trump says there will be a ‘bloodbath’ if he loses the election”

Rolling Stone: “Trump Says There Will Be a ‘Bloodbath’ and Elections Will End if He Isn’t Reelected”

New York Times: “Trump Defends His Warning of a ‘Blood Bath for the Country’”

The Atlantic: “Trump Says He’ll Be a Dictator on ‘Day One’”

Associated Press: “Trump declines to rule out abusing power to seek retribution if he returns to the White House”

Washington Post: “Trump calls political enemies ‘vermin,’ echoing dictators Hitler, Mussolini”

The Guardian: “Donald Trump says he will lock up his political enemies if he is president again.”

Forbes: “Trump said of his relationships with dictators, ‘the tougher and meaner they are, the better I get along with them,’ which he insisted is ‘not a bad thing.’

“‘The easy ones,’ Trump said, referring to America’s allies, ‘I maybe don’t like as much or don’t get along with as much.’”

The Atlantic: “Late Friday night, the former president of the United States—and a leading candidate to be the next president—insinuated that America’s top general deserves to be put to death. That extraordinary sentence would be unthinkable in any other rich democracy. But Donald Trump, on his social-media network, Truth Social, wrote that Mark Milley’s phone call to reassure China in the aftermath of the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was ‘an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH.’”
Then you have one of the posters literally and hypocritically saying he's ok with murdering political figures blame Trump for his actions. This is nothing more than cowardice that Democrats have mastered. He blames Trump for someone trying to murder Trump. Especially after you openly advocating for murder. You specifically...

But stay on point please. Why is ok for you to openly advocate for murder? Don't muddy the conversation. You can start your own thread.
 
Then you have one of the posters literally and hypocritically saying he's ok with murdering political figures blame Trump for his actions. This is nothing more than cowardice that Democrats have mastered. He blames Trump for someone trying to murder Trump. Especially after you openly advocating for murder. You specifically...

But stay on point please. Why is ok for you to openly advocate for murder? Don't muddy the conversation. You can start your own thread

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.
 
Play stupid games win stupid prizes.
Like I said, Democrats openly advocate for the murder of political candidates, they don't deny it.... they just make excuses as to why you are pro-assassin. Democrats have it figured out. They can openly advocated to murder and be violent as long as they blame Trump. They literally blame Trump for a Democrat spewing the same hate filled nonsense we see here trying to kill someone. Now my question is, why is this allowed? Why was it allowed? Is it because those guilty are a massive influence here? I understand that that is a lot of clicks but I don't understand how it's just swept under the rug. It is not ok... It is wrong... Disgusting.... VIle...
 
NBC News: “Trump says there will be a ‘bloodbath’ if he loses the election”

Rolling Stone: “Trump Says There Will Be a ‘Bloodbath’ and Elections Will End if He Isn’t Reelected”

New York Times: “Trump Defends His Warning of a ‘Blood Bath for the Country’”
Trump is just too educated for the easy to manipulate even though this doesn't take an education, just common sense.... It's embarrassing that people don't know basic words. This is Qanon type level of propaganda you fell for. Proof that Democrats have to blatantly lie ....
bloodbath.png
 
Trump is just too educated for the easy to manipulate even though this doesn't take an education, just common sense.... It's embarrassing that people don't know basic words. This is Qanon type level of propaganda you fell for. Proof that Democrats have to blatantly lie ....
View attachment 17218

Yeah the first thing that comes to mind when you hear the word bloodbath is the economy. For sure.

You're a lousy troll and I'm in the mood to **** with you, that's about it.
 
People advocating for murder is bad.

But I feel like you'd be able to get your point across a lot better if you stopped framing it as "Democrats advocate for murder" instead of "<Insert name or names here> advocated for murder".

I've seen some people advocate for assassinating Democratic candidates, and some people advocating for assassinating Republican candidates. They're not good people. The idiot who attempted the assassination this weekend was a former Trump supporter whose political views seemed to hop all over the place, and I don't doubt he had a lot of major mental health issues.
 
Yeah the first thing that comes to mind when you hear the word bloodbath is the economy. For sure.

You're a lousy troll and I'm in the mood to **** with you, that's about it.
Lol run away and call me a troll. Yeah get the hell out of here, wasting my time you little troll. It's pretty clear what he was talking about...

“We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected,” Trump said. “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole — that’s gonna be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That will be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars. They’re building massive factories.”

bloodbath.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
People advocating for murder is bad.

But I feel like you'd be able to get your point across a lot better if you stopped framing it as "Democrats advocate for murder" instead of "<Insert name or names here> advocated for murder".

I've seen some people advocate for assassinating Democratic candidates, and some people advocating for assassinating Republican candidates. They're not good people. The idiot who attempted the assassination this weekend was a former Trump supporter whose political views seemed to hop all over the place, and I don't doubt he had a lot of major mental health issues.
But I see people like Vindman and his wife. I see Democrats all over openly supporting it. Laughing at it... Mocking it... It is the Democrats.. This is the guy and his wife that literally helped get Trump impeached... This rhetoric spewed by Democrats is the exact... EXACT... rhetoric Biden and Kamala push.... Am I wrong? Telling us Trump is a threat, he's Hilter(uneducation morons), Project 25 conspiracies literally made up out of thin air? Kamala literally pushed project 25 yet Trump has never said a word about it. It IS the Democrat party. Their lies and deception like saying wants a bloodbath when he was OBVIOSLY talking about the vehicle market is what inspired this guy.

Wife of Trump impeachment witness mocks second assassination attempt: 'Carry on'​


WASHINGTON (TND) — The wife of Alexander Vindman, who testified during the 2019 impeachment inquiry into former President Donald Trump, mocked on Sunday what the FBI called an apparent second assassination attempt on the Republican.

Secret Service agents fired at a suspected gunman Sunday at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida. Authorities believe the suspect intended to target Trump, who was golfing at the time.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
But I see people like Vindman and his wife. I see Democrats all over openly supporting it. Laughing at it... Mocking it... It is the Democrats.. This is the guy and his wife that literally helped get Trump impeached... This rhetoric spewed by Democrats is the exact... EXACT... rhetoric Biden and Kamala push.... Am I wrong? Telling us Trump is a threat, he's Hilter(uneducation morons), Project 25 conspiracies literally made up out of thin air? Kamala literally pushed project 25 yet Trump has never said a word about it. It IS the Democrat party.

Wife of Trump impeachment witness mocks second assassination attempt: 'Carry on'​


WASHINGTON (TND) — The wife of Alexander Vindman, who testified during the 2019 impeachment inquiry into former President Donald Trump, mocked on Sunday what the FBI called an apparent second assassination attempt on the Republican.

Secret Service agents fired at a suspected gunman Sunday at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida. Authorities believe the suspect intended to target Trump, who was golfing at the time.

Yes, you are wrong to frame it as "Democrats" when the overwhelming majority of Democrats are anti-assassination, instead of just some idiots on social media. You also come off as unhinged when you do this.

As for Project 2025, you're just wrong. Well over 100 people in Trump's previous administration worked on crafting Project 2025. The leader of Project 2025 is publishing a book this month that summarizes the ideas of Project 2025 while pushing heavily for them. JD Vance himself wrote the foreword in this book.
 
Yes, you are wrong to frame it as "Democrats" when the overwhelming majority of Democrats are anti-assassination, instead of just some idiots on social media. You also come off as unhinged when you do this.

As for Project 2025, you're just wrong. Well over 100 people in Trump's previous administration worked on crafting Project 2025. The leader of Project 2025 is publishing a book this month that summarizes the ideas of Project 2025 while pushing heavily for them. JD Vance himself wrote the foreword in this book.
Ok, Alt-Left Democrats. Point taken.

You're literally pushing conspiracies. Show me once... Just once... where Trump endorsed anything in Project 25. Show your evidence that he is involved. You all just hear what you want to hear... You literally creating a lie out of thin air... But prove me wrong please....You all do nothing but create blatant lies out of nowhere to hurt Trump. This rhetoric... DEMOCRAT rhetoric is stuff the *** hat who tried to kill Trump pushed too. Trump has done NOTHING but disavow it. How you can blatantly lie about this is the rhetoric I'm referring to.

CNN:

Project 2025 director steps down amid backlash from Trump​


The director of Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for a potential second Donald Trump term, has stepped down amid intense criticism including from the former president.

Paul Dans, a former top adviser in Trump’s administration, steered Project 2025 as it carved a leading role in shaping discourse around what conservatives dreamed they could accomplish if Republicans won back the White House. While a source with knowledge of the planning said Project 2025 would be effectively ending its policy operations, others familiar with the matter noted that it was always the plan to move on to the next phase now – and efforts to build a conservative personnel apparatus would continue.

Project 2025’s plans to radically reshape the federal government and American life, spelled out in detail in an exhaustive 900-page playbook, provided ample fodder for Democrats to warn against Trump’s return to power.


In recent months, Trump has lashed out against Project 2025, calling some of its ideas “absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.” He strained to distance himself from the work, claiming he had “no idea who is behind it.” Top Trump adviser Chris LaCivita recently referred to Project 2025 as “a pain the a**” for the Trump campaign.

 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Ok, Alt-Left Democrats. Point taken.
I'm an alt-left Democrat. Good to know. Nevermind that I spent too much time on here literally yesterday arguing against other Democrats with regard to Kamala's social media regulation proposals.

You're literally pushing conspiracies. Show me once... Just once... where Trump endorsed anything in Project 25. Show your evidence that he is involved. You all just hear what you want to hear... You literally creating a lie out of thin air... But prove me wrong please.... CNN.
Are you denying that well over a hundred members of Trump's previous campaign were involved with putting together Project 2025? Are you denying that JD Vance wrote the foreword to a book being published this month that heavily endorses it? Because those are the two things I stated. Both are easily verifiable facts. You yourself referenced Paul Dans, who oversaw Project 2025 and was a top advisor in Trump's previous campaign. Calling them conspiracies just makes you look insane.

I realize Trump himself is trying to distance himself from it, given how unpopular it is, but I would hope at minimum you could understand people being skeptical of his claim that he has nothing to do with Project 2025 when his previous staff was littered with people who crafted it and his VP candidate wrote the foreword to a book that heavily endorses it. It would be one thing if Trump had a pristine track record for honesty, which would warrant giving him the benefit of the doubt. But that isn't reality.
 
I'm an alt-left Democrat. Good to know. Nevermind that I spent too much time on here literally yesterday arguing against other Democrats with regard to Kamala's social media regulation proposals.


Are you denying that well over a hundred members of Trump's previous campaign were involved with putting together Project 2025? Are you denying that JD Vance wrote the foreword to a book being published this month that heavily endorses it? Because those are the two things I stated. Both are easily verifiable facts. You yourself referenced Paul Dans, who oversaw Project 2025 and was a top advisor in Trump's previous campaign. Calling them conspiracies just makes you look insane.

I realize Trump himself is trying to distance himself from it, given how unpopular it is, but I would hope at minimum you could understand people being skeptical of his claim that he has nothing to do with Project 2025 when his previous staff was littered with people who crafted it and his VP candidate wrote the foreword to a book that heavily endorses it. It would be one thing if Trump had a pristine track record for honesty, which would warrant giving him the benefit of the doubt. But that isn't reality.
I'm a Republican we aren't sitting here talking about how we take over world with something like Project 25, your(Alt-Left Democrats)very insinuation as such is insulting. The only ones making a big deal out of it is the propagandist ...To think that's what we are voting and were too stupid to see it is nothing more than a lie. Trump has NOTHING to do with Project 25. It's nothing more than dramatic fluff for the easy to manipulate. Just like the stupid Russia hoax where Hillary paid Christopher Steele millions of dollars for propaganda LITERALLY created by Russian entities. Lol alt left Democrats saying there were tapes of Trump peeing on people... Lololol so stupid.

You're literally pushing a blatant hoax. If Trump wins, that's a big IF he's not going to completely take over the country. It's so embarrassingly dramatic and false. Just as if Kamala wins. We'll be much broker and miserable but we'll be fine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Without reading, "Democrat Extremist" is an oxymoron.
Extremists commonly seek to promote and enforce their ideologies through acts of violence, coercion, or intolerance.

Man, what a let down. Got to have better aim

Would be cool if Trump stopped doing rallies.


Trump deserves to be shot every rally for this kind of stuff

More than 1 person was killed…

RIP to them. They shouldn't have gotten in the way

I really look forward to the comedy that is political news coverage coming from this.
 
I'm a Republican we aren't sitting here talking about how we take over world with something like Project 25, your(Alt-Left Democrats)very insinuation as such is insulting.
I didn't say that.

The only ones making a big deal out of it is the propagandist ...To think that's what we are voting and were too stupid to see it is nothing more than a lie. Trump has NOTHING to do with Project 25. It's nothing more than dramatic fluff for the easy to manipulate.

You're literally pushing a blatant hoax. If Trump wins, that's a big IF he's not going to completely take over the country. It's so embarrassingly dramatic and false. Just as if Kamala wins. We'll be much broker and miserable but we'll be fine.
You're not even addressing what I said. Once again: I would hope at minimum you could understand people being skeptical of Trump's claim that he has nothing to do with Project 2025 when his previous staff was littered with people who crafted it and his VP candidate wrote the foreword to a book that heavily endorses it. Address that like an adult, and not with some unhinged "You're just repeating a hoax!".

It's frustrating trying to talk to somebody who just calls you an "alt-left Democrat" when you disagree with them, and responds to easily verifiable facts with "You're just pushing a hoax!".
 
The 2nd assassin spews the same hateful and bigoted conspiracies and bigotry that is openly spouted here. These people point the finger at everyone else yet their rhetoric is leading to assassination attempts and violence. How can any of you point at others when you openly supported murder?

It's just mine boggling that "fight like hell" and the pro murder crowd haven't shut up about it for 4 years. Yet Biden says "time to put Trump in the bullseye" and what do Democrats say?

Cy is here openly getting off on someone trying to assassinate... literal MURDER....and he's heralded as a hero around here.
lmao bro has my post bookmarked
 
Back
Top