Yes. That's a great point. Considering the careers of the #3 and #4 players (and even the #1 when he's not hurt), you have to view Marvin's career to date as disappointing. He was also EXTREMELY raw coming out, and it was acknowledged on draft boards he'd take time to develop.Most of the hate comes from where he was drafted. Atlanta used a top 2 pick on him.
Do you even understand the concept of this thread?
They dont know Harris sucks because he hasnt played for them yet.
The day after Al got traded I checked out the Wolves forum. It sounded very similar.
I agree some of the joy is because he was number 2 overall, but that still dont change they dont care for him.
You know who else was a bust on their draft team? How about Favors???
There is a very real possibility that Williams will have a similar change to what Favors had coming here. He gets a little respect, he gets the ball passed to him, and he is friends with his teamates. Oh, and the fans cheer for him rather than boo him.
Besides, he's not making an unreasonable amount of money for what he's putting out, in fact I wouldn't be horrified if we re-signed him for the same amount when his contract is up ASSUMING that he improves his game by about 25%.
In order to get picked in the top 3 a player usually has to have certain raw talents that cannot be learned. He has these talents, Millsap doesn't. No matter how hard Millsap works, there are some things that Williams can do that he can't.
(not that Millsap doesn't bring great things to the table, in fact if Williams spends some time with Millsap and picks up his work ethic, Williams might actually come close to his potential. hmm, guess i'm bandwagoning.)
Back in the day, I'm sure 76er fans weren't happy having Jeff Hornacek as their "star" player to replace Charles Barkley. Did that stop Hornacek from have a great career in Utah?
Hawks fans think they have a shot at Howard and Chris Paul. That should confirm how delusional they are.
mods,
please lock or move to the stupid forum.
thanks.
All I am saying is there is a chance we dont like his game once he gets here.
Looking at the TOTAL impact on us this trade accomplishes, it looks like an upgrade to me, despite Marvin's perceived weaknesses in Atlanta.
Mo replaces Harris, improves our offense, some dropoff in D, as Mo is smallish (6'1").
Hayward replaces Bell at SG. Solid upgrade; better defender, playmaker and a bigger and better rebounder.
Marvin replaces Hayward at SF. Solid upgrade. Not sure of his D, but a stronger rebounder as he's as big as Millsap, and better jump shooter as a SF than Hayward. HOPEFULLY he'll pick up our offense.
They do. Did you see Hollinger's column?
So, just to clarify, and because it doesn't seem to have been touched on yet in this thread.......what spot was Marvin Williams drafted?
Atlanta wanted a #2 pick out of Marvin Williams. The Jazz want a wing who can hit threes, defend and rebound. That is why he will be successful here and not there.
p.s. I was pissed because Harrison Barnes slipped to GS's pick. I told friends and family that even if Barnes just came into Utah, ran the offense and hit threes, I would have loved him. Marvin Williams can do all those things. This could trade is anywhere from a good trade to a spectacular one, depending on if Williams just puts forth a tiny bit of interest.
Hawks are playing a high stake poker IMO. Who will blink first? Orlando is still in talks with the Nets - don't count them out yet.
King is doing the right thing, playing Orlando & Hawks off each other right now.
There's going to be a drought of PG's.
The Johnson deal is done unless I'm reading ESPN wrong. The Nets have relinquished Howard forever.
Elaborate?