* Gay men report, on an average, slightly longer and thicker penises than non-gay men.[48]
Goddammit....That explains that. Sucks to be straight.
* Gay men report, on an average, slightly longer and thicker penises than non-gay men.[48]
I'd settle for just seeing the think tank beantown regularly consults with.
Really? Where does invitro fertilization fall in the wide span of biology and evolution? What do your "handfull" of biologists and evolutionists think of that?
I'm really not sure how else to say this, but I've shown that they do participate in evolution. Again, I ask you to find something scientifically based that supports your position.
I kind of feel bad for Beanclown.
Goddammit....That explains that. Sucks to be straight.
While it's true that homosexuals are participating in our species' evolution in the form of population control, the are, at the same time, not participating in our species' evolution. This is because their participation is voided out due to the fact that they're gay, something we don't like very much. Does that make sense?I'm really not sure how else to say this, but I've shown that they do participate in evolution. Again, I ask you to find something scientifically based that supports your position.
Sorry to interject, but he was not using gender as an example. Get it right Mr. Biologist. He used one's "sex." Which means M or F. Gender is one's propensity towards masculinity or feminism. Masculine male, feminine male, masculine female or feminine female. Thats gender.
I got this Beantown:
While it's true that homosexuals are participating in our species' evolution in the form of population control, the are, at the same time, not participating in our species' evolution. This is because their participation is voided out due to the fact that they're gay, something we don't like very much. Does that make sense?
If homosexuals can produce offspring and participate in evolution and genetic diversity I will happily change my opinion.
They can.
Only if they participate in heterosexual relations.
Really? Where does invitro fertilization fall in the wide span of biology and evolution? What do your "handfull" of biologists and evolutionists think of that?
Thats a heterosexual process. There is still a man and woman invovled.
No, you will just change the statement you use to exclude them, as you have done in the past.
How long did that take YB?
To make that post? Less than a minute. Open a new tab, quote/copy/paste. Simple.
Goddammit....That explains that. Sucks to be straight.