I can tell you that the survivalist/constitutionalist groups are all about getting cops and military to stand by their oaths and to either stand down or fight for the people under that scenario. And that they already have a lot of them on their side. So the line of who exactly is the government would be under that scenario would be blurred, depending on how many cops and military would fight. It might be government v. "government".
It is your right. I like rights better than anything, so I agree. But I still say its pathetic to be worshiping guns the way people do. I wish people would lock them up better or something. The nonchalant attitude people have towards the danger they posses is freaking stupid. The mother of Adam Lanza represents the attitude and stupidity people have towards them. She didnt do enough and neither do a lot of people.
Like I said. Im all for rights Knock yourself out I guess. Just keep them away from me. Its kind of like gays. Im all for their rights. Just stay away from me freaks.
Yeah, because I'm sure the gays would be all over you.
Having guns and especially assault rifles is really important. I'm not going to pay attention to facts that say that countries that have gun bans haven't become totalitarian dictatorships or that gun-related mortality rates plummet because facts aren't important. Having a gun is really important, though. Probably the most important thing there is or could ever be.
There could be no conceivable consequence to valuing an arbitrary and dangerous "right" over sensibility and there's no conceivable way we've been watching the consequences for the entire history of this country.
Just kidding guys, HUNTING! And RIGHTS!
You're so black and white with this, calling everyone who's pro-gun stupid in your own special way. You're a pretty smart dude so what's the mental block with guns? Why are you anti to the point of not acknowledging all the innocent women and children they have saved? Doesn't add up to me.
"All the innocent"? How many? And against what threat?
Arms races don't end well.
Gonna keep ranting:
That something CAN do good does not mean that it WILL do good. It's all about balance. Is there any possible way giving lunatics and morons deadly force with extreme ease a net positive?
Let me clarify: To need guns to defend against guns is not an argument that guns are good.
To need legs to run away from somebody that is chasing you is not an argument that having legs is good.
To need legs to run away from somebody that is chasing you is not an argument that having legs is good.
Legs themselves will not kill someone. The bullets from the gun will.
So it's the bullets that need to be banned, not guns?
So it's the bullets that need to be banned, not guns?