What's new
By:

The Gordon Hayward mistake has screwed the Jazz for years to come

Gordon was absolutely dreadful in his return. Better trade him for whatever we can get; he's clearly a bust as the OP noted.
 
This is just a Clippers fan trying to get us to believe Hayward sucks so they can get Milsap + Hayward for Bledsoe.
 
Weezur said:
This is just a Clippers fan trying to get us to believe Hayward sucks so they can get Milsap + Hayward for Bledsoe.
Click to expand...

Seemed to backfire. I'm going to go to a Clippers board and do the opposite to try to force a trade.

BeastlyBledsoe will be my username.
 
mhindy said:
Seemed to backfire. I'm going to go to a Clippers board and do the opposite to try to force a trade.

BeastlyBledsoe will be my username.
Click to expand...

We need a troll army from this site.
I also want someone to convince Minnesota that Rubio sucks.
 
I was going to go the opposite direction and pull a HeavenHarris just to make them hate Bledsoe. I swear, HH did that way more than Harris mediocre play.
 
It's threads like this that make me want to abuse my mod powers to close it, but on the other hand I'd rather let the idiocy stand.
 
b_liner1 said:
Also, Hayward is very good. And Paul George was shorter than hayseed at draft time. Plus Hayward had just had a great run in the tourney. George was not as impressive before he grew four inches out of nowhere
Click to expand...

George always had more athleticism, height, length, skills and NBA upside.

George is an NBA all-star.

Hayward will never be one.

The Lakers are catching up and the Gordon Hayward Jazz will miss the playoffs. Could the situation be any bleaker?

2012-2013 Statistics

Gordon Hayward
14.1 ppg. 3.0 rpg. 2.5 apg. 0.7 spg. (mediocre)

Paul George
17.6 ppg. 7.9 rpg. 4.0 apg. 1.8 spg. (rising all-star)

Pre-Draft Measurements

Name: Gordon Hayward
Position: SG/SF
Height without shoes: 6'6.75"
Height with shoes: 6'8"
Weight: 211
Wingspan: 6'7.75"
Standing reach: 8'7"

Name: Paul George
Position: SG/SF
Height without shoes: 6'7.75"
Height with shoes: 6'9"
Weight: 214
Wingspan: 6'11.25"
Standing reach: 8'11"

The facts speak for themselves. Jazz fans were correct in booing the Gordon Hayward pick on draft day, especially considering Paul George was available and taken by the Pacers with the following pick.

The playoff-bound Pacers' roster isn't any better than the Jazz.'

Yet one player is leading his team to the playoffs.

The other won't.
 
cyclo said:
George always had more athleticism, height, length, skills and NBA upside.

George is an NBA all-star.

Hayward will never be one.

The Lakers are catching up and the Gordon Hayward Jazz will miss the playoffs. Could the situation be any bleaker?

2012-2013 Statistics

Gordon Hayward
14.1 ppg. 3.0 rpg. 2.5 apg. 0.7 spg. (mediocre)

Paul George
17.6 ppg. 7.9 rpg. 4.0 apg. 1.8 spg. (rising all-star)

Pre-Draft Measurements

Name: Gordon Hayward
Position: SG/SF
Height without shoes: 6'6.75"
Height with shoes: 6'8"
Weight: 211
Wingspan: 6'7.75"
Standing reach: 8'7"

Name: Paul George
Position: SG/SF
Height without shoes: 6'7.75"
Height with shoes: 6'9"
Weight: 214
Wingspan: 6'11.25"
Standing reach: 8'11"

The facts speak for themselves. Jazz fans were correct in booing the Gordon Hayward pick on draft day, especially considering Paul George was available and taken by the Pacers with the following pick.

The playoff-bound Pacers' roster isn't any better than the Jazz.'

Yet one player is leading his team to the playoffs.

The other won't.
Click to expand...

You are an idiot. Hayward's per 36 numbers are better than George's. the only reason George's numbers are so good is because he plays 39 mpg. Hayward's numbers per 39 would be like 19 ppg and 5 and 5. That is definitely all star material. I will bet you money that Hayward will have at least one all star game
 
AKMVP

You have not changed your mind about Kanter at all ? Oh man, Valanciunas can be good player, but Kanter is proving that he can be a great one... you can´t be that blind.
 
CAKAR said:
AKMVP

You have not changed your mind about Kanter at all ? Oh man, Valanciunas can be good player, but Kanter is proving that he can be a great one... you can´t be that blind.
Click to expand...

Kanter is showing me that he is better then what I saw in his predraft videos or games he played. He showed that he has great work etic and that alone with his strong body can make him very good player in the future. But I am still not convinced he will be better then JV though when it is all said and done. Just my 2 cents.
 
AKMVP said:
Kanter is showing me that he is better then what I saw in his predraft videos or games he played. He showed that he has great work etic and that alone with his strong body can make him very good player in the future. But I am still not convinced he will be better then JV though when it is all said and done. Just my 2 cents.
Click to expand...

And you don´t thing that it needs also talent to be that Big and Strong with a touch like Kanter has ? He just got limited minutes untill now, but he is still ready to put down a monster game, when you give him PT....

AS a JAZZFAN what are you expecting from Kanter to convince you, that he was the better pick ?
 
AKMVP said:
Kanter is showing me that he is better then what I saw in his predraft videos or games he played. He showed that he has great work etic and that alone with his strong body can make him very good player in the future. But I am still not convinced he will be better then JV though when it is all said and done. Just my 2 cents.
Click to expand...

Almost repped you then I kept reading.....seriously?.....!????
 
cyclo said:
George always had more athleticism, height, length, skills and NBA upside.

George is an NBA all-star.

Hayward will never be one.

The Lakers are catching up and the Gordon Hayward Jazz will miss the playoffs. Could the situation be any bleaker?

2012-2013 Statistics

Gordon Hayward
14.1 ppg. 3.0 rpg. 2.5 apg. 0.7 spg. (mediocre)

Paul George
17.6 ppg. 7.9 rpg. 4.0 apg. 1.8 spg. (rising all-star)

Pre-Draft Measurements

Name: Gordon Hayward
Position: SG/SF
Height without shoes: 6'6.75"
Height with shoes: 6'8"
Weight: 211
Wingspan: 6'7.75"
Standing reach: 8'7"

Name: Paul George
Position: SG/SF
Height without shoes: 6'7.75"
Height with shoes: 6'9"
Weight: 214
Wingspan: 6'11.25"
Standing reach: 8'11"

The facts speak for themselves. Jazz fans were correct in booing the Gordon Hayward pick on draft day, especially considering Paul George was available and taken by the Pacers with the following pick.

The playoff-bound Pacers' roster isn't any better than the Jazz.'

Yet one player is leading his team to the playoffs.

The other won't.
Click to expand...

This is B.S. So what if George turns out to be better. They're both good picks and any team would love to have them, just like with DWill and Paul.
 
b_liner1 said:
You are an idiot. Hayward's per 36 numbers are better than George's. the only reason George's numbers are so good is because he plays 39 mpg. Hayward's numbers per 39 would be like 19 ppg and 5 and 5. That is definitely all star material. I will bet you money that Hayward will have at least one all star game
Click to expand...

If it were that easy, the Jazz could just play Hayward more minutes -- Hayward would be an all-star as you claim and the Jazz would make the playoffs -- but increased minutes have not increased Hayward's productivity per minute. Just the opposite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top