What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

orangello said:
Why SVG specifically?
Click to expand...

I think this says it all:

140px-StanVanGundy_20050723.jpg
 
honestly Corbin's bad coaching cost the jazz at least 2 or 3 victories this season. that is the difference between the playoffs and not.

McCollum could be the pg of the future for the jazz more then just a rotational player. there are a lot of question marks about alot of players and if those said players work through those questions there will be some good players later in this draft.
 
Burks + McCollum + Hayward make a nice versatile perimeter team that plays defense, scores and passes thereby making life better for our bigs.

McCollum replaces Mo basically, while Burks replaces Foye.
 
for drafting at 14or17 and 20or21 in a crappy draft I'm pretty happy at the options. The idea of McCollum and Withey sounds surprisingly decent. Withey looks to be a great backup and McCollum could be special - at around 17, that's a great gamble.

Of course, I'd prefer to miss the playoffs to be more likely to get McCollum and more likely to dump Corbin.

SVG too? Wow.
 
BENTLEY said:
for drafting at 14or17 and 20or21 in a crappy draft I'm pretty happy at the options. The idea of McCollum and Withey sounds surprisingly decent. Withey looks to be a great backup and McCollum could be special - at around 17, that's a great gamble.

Of course, I'd prefer to miss the playoffs to be more likely to get McCollum and more likely to dump Corbin.

SVG too? Wow.
Click to expand...

btw great to have you back.
 
BENTLEY said:
for drafting at 14or17 and 20or21 in a crappy draft I'm pretty happy at the options. The idea of McCollum and Withey sounds surprisingly decent. Withey looks to be a great backup and McCollum could be special - at around 17, that's a great gamble.

Of course, I'd prefer to miss the playoffs to be more likely to get McCollum and more likely to dump Corbin.

SVG too? Wow.
Click to expand...

I agree with your post.

And agree with xthren..... you are one of my favorite posters and it would be nice to have you back posting more often.

Repped cause i miss ya
 
Bentley rep train? Choo choo, whos with me?
 
Draft Express' Jeff Withey's video for those who haven't seen. Weaknesses worries me. He still has a ways to go offensively and he's already 23, is he already close to as good as he can be?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM41rDsQ_7k
 
^He's a backup.

My biggest concern is the mental stuff. You can't do **** in the NBA if you can't stay engaged (see Marshun Barks)
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Draft Express' Jeff Withey's video for those who haven't seen. Weaknesses worries me. He still has a ways to go offensively and he's already 23, is he already close to as good as he can be?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM41rDsQ_7k
Click to expand...


Big men take the longest to reach their peak, so could still refine some offensive skills and put on 10 lbs. But at 23, ya its pretty much wysiwyg.
 
Withey's first anchor on offense should be a plain spot-up shot. If defenses have to respect an 18-20 foot shot, then that gives him something to work from (and he'll be more athletic than the average backup guarding him).
 
ESPN thinks Withey could be Asik's replacement:

Withey is almost tailor made for Chicago as an Asik replacement: He's a true 7-footer with an active, athletic body (Withey is a former volleyball player like fellow San Diego native Budinger). Plus, he's an excellent rebounder and was one of the best shot-blockers in the nation. Offensively, he's going to do most of his damage off of putbacks as well as dunks and layups off drive-and-dish plays. However, he also does a nice job of moving without the ball, utilizing weakside duck-ins and cuts to the rim.
Click to expand...

Withey needs to play tougher IMO to survive in the NBA. Saw him a few times in the tournament, I see defensive skills, clever tricks in trying to get that block without fouling. But not yet the same kind of toughness that the turkish have shown though (Kanter & Asik).
 
At least we have the draft to look forward to, which always symbolizes hope.
Again, this year looks ok - considering the decent stuff that will fall to the Jazz. The draft isn't deep but it's wide. Does that make sense?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top