That's not the argument.
Just kidding, we need BIG ALL to play PG.
So what's your argument then when you said Larkin is smallest guy therefore we shouldn't draft him?
That's not the argument.
Just kidding, we need BIG ALL to play PG.
So what's your argument then when you said Larkin is smallest guy therefore we shouldn't draft him?
Not to mention Larkin tested out as the best athlete at the combine. If Larkin was 6-2 or 6-3 he would be going top 5.
It's an idiotic argument, especially coming from someone who spent so much time mocking those who didn't like Millsap- who plays a position where size is much more important IMO- because of his size.The "Larkin is smallest guy" therefore "he must suck" argument.
It features some nuance, you might have a tough time digesting it.
#InaneAndPointlessHashtagBro
No it doesn't. It's simplistic and ignorant.It features some nuance
guys, if hes moved those picks to Larkin and Saric, hes heard the jazz are looking for passing, triple threat players, also i bet they are looking for players who can get the ball to the bigs...
these players are 2 of the best passers in the draft.. saric might be the best, outside of MCW, he might be better tho..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbdgEw85jU4
saric is certainly a better passer than this years adam morrison, Nate Wolters
Saric vs. Giannis (what I could glean from DX)
Both born in '94. Saric is 8 months older (big deal).
Saric listed 27 lbs heavier than Giannis.
Wingspan: Saric 6'10" vs. Giannis 7'3"
3pt: Saric 30% vs. Giannis 34%
FT: Saric 50% vs. Giannis 70%
Both are said to be good passers. But Giannis enormous hands are talked about as strengths in passing, ball-handling, and finishing.
Saric defense numbers look meh. Giannis is also less than spectacular here but the writeup mentions that defensively the aspect of the game in which he has the most potential.
I've never seen either play - except online clips. Based on very little info I'm leaning Giannis.
Anyone care to enlighten me?
Saric will be OK offensively, not sure how he'll go against the SFs of the NBA though... I don't think he can stay in front of them.
So what is worse,
Larkin @ 14 (DX)
or
Plumlee @ 14 (nbadraft.net)
?
Honestly, I couldn't tell you which one I hated more.
It's an idiotic argument, especially coming from someone who spent so much time mocking those who didn't like Millsap- who plays a position where size is much more important IMO- because of his size.
Saric will be OK offensively, not sure how he'll go against the SFs of the NBA though... I don't think he can stay in front of them.
Toss-up. I'd maybe take Plumlee as bpa, though.
Saric vs. Giannis (what I could glean from DX)
Both born in '94. Saric is 8 months older (big deal).
Saric listed 27 lbs heavier than Giannis.
Wingspan: Saric 6'10" vs. Giannis 7'3"
3pt: Saric 30% vs. Giannis 34%
FT: Saric 50% vs. Giannis 70%
Both are said to be good passers. But Giannis enormous hands are talked about as strengths in passing, ball-handling, and finishing.
Saric defense numbers look meh. Giannis is also less than spectacular here but the writeup mentions that defensive is the aspect of the game in which he has the most potential.
I've never seen either play - except online clips. Based on very little info I'm leaning Giannis.
Anyone care to enlighten me?