& tried to rep. The 535 D.C. Line is so felching tiresome. Like well intentioned representatives have nothing to do besides plot on Capitol Hill about destroying the world. It's not a cartoon, people.
/soapbox
Thoughts on the stock market and
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
& tried to rep. The 535 D.C. Line is so felching tiresome. Like well intentioned representatives have nothing to do besides plot on Capitol Hill about destroying the world. It's not a cartoon, people.
/soapbox
leftyjace
Well-Known Member
As a student of the dismal science, I beg to differ. Even politics itself is nothing more than a variable in the Supply/Demand Curve.
MoreFeasts
Member
Dal you aren't making a lot of sense. So are all politicians great or not? Where did I say that they are all bad?
Sry, bungled a quote from my boss: political science is the only science that matters [because people are mentally lazy and tend to believe the most *** backward feel good nonsense).
Duck Rodgers
Well-Known Member
Nice. I just thought it looked quite tame when you compare it just straight up with how the Nikkei has moved around. You might be getting killed a little over the past few weeks, but it's more like 10% in that thing - which is not too bad. Like running into a mediocre earning's report or something after a good run up.
No 10%. I "dipped" on the Abe election as I said in the stocks thread and took a little time to build heavy by going straight the non-hedged etf since I never saw a good entry point into DXJ -- obviously a bad decision @ EWJ 11.2.. I'm sure when I get off vacation I'll check into some bad stuff. What I get for being greedy over 20 cents.
MoreFeasts
Member
So what you are really saying is that most politicians are selfish ******** who don't care about the public interests, although there are a few exceptions. You are not making any sense. Why do you want to base your opinion on politicians based on the exceptions and not the majority? Where did I say that all politicians are out to get us?
I wasn't addressing you, and I have an innovative new phrase: go **** yourself.
MoreFeasts
Member
Why are you telling me you weren't addressing me when I wasn't addressing you, and why are you swearing at me?
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
How about you don't make sweeping judgements about municipalities you have no connection to, or on individuals you have never heard of?
Or you can, if you want to continue to make an utter fool of yourself.
MoreFeasts
Member
You are the one who provided the evidence of how great politicians are by telling us that one politician thought all the other politicians were so bad that he left his party. So I was just looking for some clarity on what the hell you were talking about. It sounds to me like your evidence proves exactly the opposite of what you are trying to prove.
MoreFeasts
Member
You are also the one making sweeping generalizations of politicians that you have no connection to.
You seem to have some sort of syndrome that makes you think that if one politician is good that this proves that all policians are good, without having any apparent ability to fathom the possibility that some are good and some are bad.
And you keep making the same accusations about me over and over , that I said something I did not say, even though I have repeatedly asked you to show where I said these things, and you ignore these requests.
You seem to have some sort of syndrome that makes you think that if one politician is good that this proves that all policians are good, without having any apparent ability to fathom the possibility that some are good and some are bad.
And you keep making the same accusations about me over and over , that I said something I did not say, even though I have repeatedly asked you to show where I said these things, and you ignore these requests.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Wrong. I said that politicians commonly have the goal of doing what they think is best for their riding, or their country. Their actions could have positive, or negative consequences-- but that is not my point. My link is a perfect example of this.
Quit making a fool of yourself, and give up arguing such a preposterous point.
MoreFeasts
Member
what did I say that was preposterous?
If the politicians are so noble in purpose, your hero would have wanted to stay on the team, not to quit his political party and be a lone wolf.
Last edited:
So lets start a new debate.
Given the state of the economy...the market...the possible impending second real estate/flipping bubble...
Growth stocks, or dividend stocks, and why?
I'll address the secondary real estate bubble. I don't see it. In 2004 - 7 banks were lending unlimited amounts to unqualified buyers and it created a false real estate reality.
When the economy tanked, the real estate holders defaulted because they couldn't pay the loans. This next group are cash buyers, at a record-breaking clip.. greater net worths.. too much to be foreclosed on (too collectible).
This real estate economy is one of the most 'real' I have ever seen, IMO.
This right there, duh.