Following potential 2014 draftees

[Ferguson_Mellochill]

Parker can score, no doubt. I think we're a contender with this guy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tT-pZcBj-gY

 

[Bawse Dawg]

Randle is consensus #3.

Sorry, I meant what team is picking third?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[spycam1]

Whose #3 in this scenario? If we could trade the #1 for #3 and a really nice asset I would take Jabari and Randle.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Did you really just suggest trading the #1 pick in 2014?

 

[spycam1]

I think Parker and Wiggins, both.. are better picks than anyone in the past drafts back to Durant.

I agree. And that's saying something when you consider Rose came out after Durant.

 

[Hotdog]

Pffft


Wiggens > Parker

 

[Bawse Dawg]

Did you really just suggest trading the #1 pick in 2014?

Can we really go wrong getting the first and second pick next year?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[spycam1]

Can we really go wrong getting the first and second pick next year?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If you trade the first pick, yes.

 

[Bawse Dawg]

If you trade the first pick, yes.

So in this fictional reality, if the Cavs were picking 3rd. You wouldn't trade the #1 for Irving and the #3? Irving, Randle, Parker. Or Wiggins and Randle?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[The Midnight]

So in this fictional reality, if the Cavs were picking 3rd. You wouldn't trade the #1 for Irving and the #3? Irving, Randle, Parker. Or Wiggins and Randle?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There's a reason it's "fictional".

 

[spycam1]

So in this fictional reality, if the Cavs were picking 3rd. You wouldn't trade the #1 for Irving and the #3? Irving, Randle, Parker. Or Wiggins and Randle?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That's tough, but if Wiggins lived up to the hype in college, I'd keep #1.

 

[Bawse Dawg]

That's tough, but if Wiggins lived up to the hype in college, I'd keep #1.

Fair enough. I don't think it's possible to have a bad outcome if we get the 1st and 2nd picks. Lol


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[A-Train (old)]

So in this fictional reality, if the Cavs were picking 3rd. You wouldn't trade the #1 for Irving and the #3? Irving, Randle, Parker. Or Wiggins and Randle?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I would take that trade Irving, Parker, Randle we would be set for years.

 

[orangello]

Burke is a back up PG in this league so let's hope the Jazz can get Wiggins/Parker and An Harrison.

 

[The Midnight]

Burke is a back up PG in this league so let's hope the Jazz can get Wiggins/Parker and An Harrison.

I think he's a nice complementary piece to a contender ala Chalmers on the Heat or Conley, etc. He's not gonna be D.Rose, but we don't need him to be.

 

[spycam1]

Burke is a back up PG in this league so let's hope the Jazz can get Wiggins/Parker and An Harrison.

I say we sacrifice orange to the draft gods.

 

[Ferguson_Mellochill]

Burke is going to be good. Enough of this back-up/Chalmers stuff. He'll be a top 10 PG in the league.

 

[orangello]

Burke is going to be good. Enough of this back-up/Chalmers stuff. He'll be a top 10 PG in the league.

Very optimistic IMO. Only time will tell.

 

[fgcamel]

I would take that trade Irving, Parker, Randle we would be set for years.

Irving/Burke
Hayward/Burks
'Bari/Rush
Randle/Kanter
Favors/Gobert

Yea, we'd be ok i guess

 

[orangello]

I say we sacrifice orange to the draft gods.

Do what you feel is best. I think Burke is the best PG out of this draft today but 3 years from now he won't be considered the best from this draft.

 

[The Midnight]

Do what you feel is best. I think Burke is the best PG out of this draft today but 3 years from now he won't be considered the best from this draft.

It's well documented that you don't need a stud PG to win Chips. We actually don't want him to be a stud PG - we'd rather he be "just decent", so we can spend $$$ on the likes of Kanter & Jabari.