Hopper appreciation thread

[C l u t c H 385]

That is unfortunate.

Well Millsapa, that's quite the understatement I figya.

 

[sirkickyass]

That is unfortunate. Why was he banned?

Five major rules violations in a 180 day period. And he got a lot of leeway. He also had six additional warnings. That was far and away the most of any poster on the site.

 

[KatieMCR]

It's about time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNQRfBAzSzo

 

[C l u t c H 385]

Queen sucks, and please stop trolling. Bigot.

 

[CONAN]

Is he banned for good?

Would it be a banning if it wasn't for good?

 

[Nate505]

Aint was a bizarre one. I liked the guy when he actually wrote like a normal #$@#%ing person, but that stupid "eh dat dis" crap was irritating to an astronomical point.

 

[C l u t c H 385]

Aint was a bizarre one. I liked the guy when he actually wrote like a normal #$@#%ing person, but that stupid "eh dat dis" crap was irritating to an astronomical point.

People who speak different than you do aren't stupid, nor are they abnormal. Bigotty McBigot.

 

[Nate505]

People who speak different than you do aren't stupid, nor are they abnormal. Bigotty McBigot.

Pretty much.

 

[LogGrad98]

aintnuthin, Hopper, Hoppy, One Brow...whateva ya wanna call him...

It's a sad day on JazzFanz. I will hold a feast of dogs in his honor. All are invited. May you be 150% straight, homophobe, transgender, transsexual, bigot, Kanye West or not. Hopper, he ROCKS. eh?!?!

Well said.








By hopper's other alt.

 

[C l u t c H 385]

Pretty much.

Purty much. Git inda spirit I sez!

 

[Shad]

I'm not gunna lie. I skipped over his posts every single time but that being said. Good on ya Hopper. Take care!

 

[Gameface]

I liked the guy a good 80-85% of the time.

 

[C l u t c H 385]

I liked the guy a good 80-85% of the time.

15-20% too low.

 

[TroutBum]

See, tithing DOES work!

 

[PearlWatson]

Would it be a banning if it wasn't for good?

Ummm...let's just say different forums have different rules. Sometimes a ban is just a time out.

 

[PearlWatson]

Five major rules violations in a 180 day period. And he got a lot of leeway. He also had six additional warnings. That was far and away the most of any poster on the site.

It was a given he broke the rules, but the real question is WHAT RULES did he break?

 

[C l u t c H 385]

It was a given he broke the rules, but the real question is WHAT RULES did he break?

None. It was just interpreted that he did.

 

[KatieMCR]

It was a given he broke the rules, but the real question is WHAT RULES did he break?

The better question is what rules did he NOT break? That would be a far shorter list.

 

[C l u t c H 385]

The better question is what rules did he NOT break? That would be a far shorter list.

zactly! eh, kat?!? cuz then we could just sez "alla dem."

 

[ruca]

"ruca!" will be "hopper!' for the rest of the week