Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
I agree the traditional grind it out, make the game ugly strategy is currently not en vogue (except in Memphis), but the fact that SA was a good offensive team doesn't make me believe Kanter is more valuable than Favors or Gobert. Big men have much more opportunity to affect the game on the defensive side of the ball than the offensive side of the ball.
To further your argument and response to tleikheen, also remember the shoot first, play no defense strategy has been done a few times in the NBA. And those teams, while exciting to watch, didn't make it very far in the playoffs.
SA pretty much invented the "3 and D" terminology. What does that second part stand for? Ummm...DEFENSE! SA did dominate Miami with their motion offense. But they were also more than adequate defensively. In fact, in terms of points allowed, Miami and SA were 5th and 6th, respectively, in the NBA last season. I think the most you could say is that with a near push in defensive prowess, SA's superior offense gave them the ultimate edge. But it clearly was not just a case of a great offense team beating a great defensive one.
tleikheen,
Did you miss the part where Snyder talked about the Jazz' transition defense? He wants less emphasis on getting offensive rebounds and more on stopping teams in transition. He also talked about contesting shots and running teams off the 3-pt line, citing a 7% FG differential between contested shots vs. open shots. Playing with pace does NOT mean run and gun. San Antonio may have been the 6th best team offensively, but they were also the 6th best DEFENSIVE team in terms of points allowed per game.
Of the top-15 defensive teams (PPG), only TWO did not make the playoffs last season. Of the top-15 offensive teams, FIVE did not make the playoffs. I think being a great defensive team clearly is of greater importance than being a top offensive team. Although the key to being a true contender lies in being in the top-tier in both categories.
Last edited: