What's new

Parsons > Hayward

This team needs shot makers, not "facilitators." What the hell does it matter if hayward can "create offense" when defenders don't have to respect his outside shot? It's AK47 all over again from the hayward deepthroaters.

It's a big reason LeBron is better than, Melo let's say.

Being a great facilitator at his size and position is very beneficial to the team.

This thread is crap.
 
It's a big reason LeBron is better than, Melo let's say.

Being a great facilitator at his size and position is very beneficial to the team.

This thread is crap.
This post is crap. LeBron is an ELITE offensive player and facilitator. Melo is only good at one. Comparing the two is a disservice to lebron.
 
I'd say they're very close. They have similar size and athletic ability. Parsons is a better offensive player, Hayward a better defender.

and we are a bad defensive team. again who makes the biggest impact on the floor. Hayward is a decent facilitator.
 
I've always said it despite Hayward is my fav player. But I've also always said that they are so similar and the difference is so little. Hayward is better at some skills, Parsons is better at some others. Overall, Parsons have only a slight advantage with his mental game traits on the court.

But at the end of the day, I believe they are so close that I find it unnecessary to even discuss about it.
 
One can shoot.

The other cannot.

One is signed as a role player.

One is signed as a max player.

This team needs shot makers, not "facilitators." What the hell does it matter if hayward can "create offense" when defenders don't have to respect his outside shot? It's AK47 all over again from the hayward deepthroaters.

Retarded. Both are signed to maximum offer sheet. Guess which team matches and which team laughs that it is overpayment?

This proves Hayward is worth much more over Parsons.
 
Hayward had much better offensive efficiency last night before the 4th quarter when the game was meaningless.

If Hayward were the 3rd option playing off of Dirk and Monta, I'm sure he'd look great.

Parsons' handle and defense are suspect, and he's a streaky shooter like Hayward is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Hayward had much better offensive efficiency last night before the 4th quarter when the game was meaningless.

If Hayward were the 3rd option playing off of Dirk and Monta, I'm sure he'd look great.

Parsons' handle and defense are suspect, and he's a streaky shooter like Hayward is.

Streaky shooter?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Shot 2/10 for 5 pts earlier this week against the Spurs.

Hayward shot 3/11 for 8 pts. against the Rockets.

Both are streaky shooters.

Don't let facts like pay and things like his other games (like the one you mentioned) get in the way of other people's hate.
 
Shot 2/10 for 5 pts earlier this week against the Spurs.

Hayward shot 3/11 for 8 pts. against the Rockets.

Both are streaky shooters.

So your sample size is 1-2 games? So in your view, where does Lebron James rank in the league? Is he even a top 20 player?

How does Parsons shoot over a course of a season? Let's look, shall we?

Last season? Parsons shot 47 percent and 37 percent from 3.
Hayward? 41 percent and 30.

So yes, let's not let those pesky lil things like facts get in the way of our hate.
 
hayward better pick that crap up because hes playing like total crap. I have faith he will find his rhythm next game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
parson is more valuable to more teams because of his versatility. overall hayward is better. but nba is changing. it's better to be good at 1 thing than be average at everything.

How much did Charlotte offer Parsons?

You can say that you think Parsons is better but to say that he is more valued by NBA teams is stupid, imo.

Hayward was offered more money and it was matched.

Parsons was offered less and allowed to walk.

Right or wrong more teams obvi see Hayward as more valuable.
 
Back
Top