All he's saying is that the sting of Haywood spurning us isn't so bad anymore because we have Mitchell now who has a higher ceiling than Haywood. I don't get what the fuss is all about.
We don't know the whole story. It could be that some dude got a fake source and tweeted something he shouldn't have and a couple other people fell for it too. It could be that Hayward never truly made his decision. Let's chill on the witch hunt til this is all sorted out.
Buter would turn us from a team that could get out the first round to a team that could get out of the second round. We should be willing to give up anyone not named Hill, Hayward, and Gobert for him. Sucks though because I think the Celtics could beat anything we can put out there.
I like reading simmons, I'm not a hater by any means...but him thinking we are planning to play Gobert/Favors/Kanter at the same time is just dumb. You can tell neither of them gave a **** about this segment. You don't have to follow the jazz to know that, that idea just doesn't make any sense.
I hate when people make threads to say what they think the jazz should have done months/years later after the fact.
We don't get exum if we keep millsap/matthews/jefferson
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.