I agree that Jokic should be MVP, but this is some silly logic. Often-times, superstars have higher scoring games out of necessity. Nuggets are 0-4 all-time when Jokic scores 50+, for example.
Not that I'd disagree with anybody putting Jokic over SGA as MVP, but I think people are super underestimating how much OKC relies on SGA's scoring.
They'd get bounced in Round 2 without him for sure.
Translate to winning in the playoffs.
I didn't word that well but my follow-up post I think summed it up well: Relying heavily on transition offense and offensive rebounding will rack up regular season wins, but that all means nothing when you score the ball in the half court like a college team.
Relying heavily on transition offense and offensive rebounding will rack up regular season wins, but that all means nothing when you score the ball in the half court like a college team.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.