Recent content by NUMBERICA

Ruh oh.

that’s a no-brainer if we have and are willing to put on the table a budding star to get a theoretical deal over the table. We don’t have a budding star or any kind of superfluous talent that gives Milwaukee something to actually work with. This is DOA.

It would be really convoluted, maybe impossible, and every team/fanbase is wondering the same thing for themselves so it would probably be insanely steep without the assurance of obtaining any value. I don’t think it’s worth wasting the bandwidth thinking about.

They didn’t sell it. They signed a free agent from the Lakers (Gail Goodrich) that triggered owing a pick to LA. (This is a cautionary tale about unintended consequences in policy; if you don’t design it well enough, it backfires. We should ponder this when we talk about flattening lottery odds.)

Okay

I really think trading them for Dame and getting control of the Bucks ‘31 and ‘32 draft is the move we’ve all been waiting for. Huge win-win.

The only team in the lottery that has never had the #1 pick is the Jazz. You could argue they have negative #1 picks considering the Magic Johnson fiasco. The NBA ****ing owes us. Especially with the push-off/5-point swing fiasco. Especially considering the highest they’ve ever drafted is a...

-Collier: more physical, more mature/better attitude, plays harder, is more consistent, better defender, has a clearer NBA role and position, and has (much) better positional size -Oscar: the perfect end-of-bench guy as he has an extremely strong specialized skill for special lineups, seems like...

Front-loaded changes things and I would definitely try to do that.

If Kas, Kon, or Tre are there at 11 then that’s a fine trade.

He’s an above average center. I would rather trade than pay what I think will be $30 million a year. I think he’d bring a good return, I just don’t know if he’s a legit playoff contributor.

That’s 6’ 5” and is plus size for position. Easily.

Also: *gasp* all he can do is shoot the lights out running off screens, really good off the dribble, and shows promise in isolation! And shows some nice ability as a playmaker for others! The point that his player archetype is volatile is a fine one but the kid is good.

It’s sort of a tradeoff scenario, but we can actually do both. I would also add that for the most part, the versatility of those swaps’ value is somewhat constrained. But having hostage swaps for if/when Giannis does go on the market would be tight (saying nothing of the scenario that they are...

Also, if we don’t include Clarkson, they save a tonnn of money.