One of the most underappreciated aspects of getting the #1 or #2 pick would be not having to agonize over who to select.
#3 would be the most fun pick for the debates.One of the most underappreciated aspects of getting the #1 or #2 pick would be not having to agonize over who to select.
Exactly. I created a thread about that scenario a while back and it sparked debate.#3 would be the most fun pick for the debates.
noI'm not sure if this has been discussed but if the pick drops to #4 or #5, would Queen be a consideration? The offensive hub potential would be hard to pass up even if there are some deficiencies to his game. Guys like Ace and VJ seem to be more complementary players, but I might be underestimating them to an extent. The rotation would be messy trying to fit Queen in but the offensive talent and skill might be worth it.
Who let you out? We don’t like you, go away. Someone get him back down in his hole.And VJ. Who some people call "too small".
Go figure.
noI'm not sure if this has been discussed but if the pick drops to #4 or #5, would Queen be a consideration?
I think (and hope) you’re right. Get Ace to play more disciplined and off-ball and it’s easy to see him excel pretty much out of the gate.Tbh, I actually think the actual decision is pretty clear at every pick except for #4. Ainge is gonna take Ace at #3 no doubt, and I think he would take the remaining blue chip at #5. We will all have our own opinions of course, but that is what I would expect from Ainge.
What is “3Pr”?Ace + Harper
Harper
USG - 28.4
eFG% - 54.0
AST% - 26.8
3Pr - 37.2
3FG% - 34.8
Ace
USG - 23.8
eFG% - 52.9
AST% - 8.3
3Pr - 30.1
3FG% - 36.8
Ace Only
USG - 33.1
eFG% - 48.4
AST% - 6.9
3Pr - 32.2
3FG% - 30.6
Harper Only
USG - 32.9
eFG% - 55.9
AST% - 39.4
3Pr - 38.6
3FG% - 28.2
3-point rateWhat is “3Pr”?
Wow that AST% by Harper without Ace is insaneAce + Harper
Harper
USG - 28.4
eFG% - 54.0
AST% - 26.8
3Pr - 37.2
3FG% - 34.8
Ace
USG - 23.8
eFG% - 52.9
AST% - 8.3
3Pr - 30.1
3FG% - 36.8
Ace Only
USG - 33.1
eFG% - 48.4
AST% - 6.9
3Pr - 32.2
3FG% - 30.6
Harper Only
USG - 32.9
eFG% - 55.9
AST% - 39.4
3Pr - 38.6
3FG% - 28.2
it's a little strange, but certainly not a big deal, that you included assist%, but not rebound% or block%.Ace + Harper
Harper
USG - 28.4
eFG% - 54.0
AST% - 26.8
3Pr - 37.2
3FG% - 34.8
Ace
USG - 23.8
eFG% - 52.9
AST% - 8.3
3Pr - 30.1
3FG% - 36.8
Ace Only
USG - 33.1
eFG% - 48.4
AST% - 6.9
3Pr - 32.2
3FG% - 30.6
Harper Only
USG - 32.9
eFG% - 55.9
AST% - 39.4
3Pr - 38.6
3FG% - 28.2
it's a little strange, but certainly not a big deal, that you included assist%, but not rebound% or block%.
Wow that AST% by Harper without Ace is insane
that make sense. probably makes more sense to just include Harper's assist percentage with and without Ace - rather than Ace's as well as then it looks more like a comparison. between the two players - one a PG whose job it is to faciliate and dish and one a wing whose job it is to score.Those are things that I would find to be the same whether they are on the court solo or duo. Like I'm not that interested in seeing if Ace blocks more shots with Harper or on the court or not, doesn't seem that relevant to me. But feel free to look up or post the numbers if you do find it relevant.