Search results

The NYPost is relaying information from a Substack article, said article having a lie in its first paragraph. Durham said the FBI opened the wrong sort of investigation, not that there should never have been one. That's the level of honesty you can expect from the authors of the Twitter files...

:p:p:p:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/documents-underscore-why-supreme-court-110006297.html

Your link disagrees with your assessment.

So you were born after 2008, because Biden does not hold a candle to Clinton nor G. W. Bush. Edited to add "not".

When you list from the full report any evidence that Biden willfully retained such materials, as opposed to accidentally, and/or disclosed such materials inappropriately, you will have evidence. All you have now is the summary of a partisan hack, one of the sort you say is not to be trusted.

No way to tell. You don't think there are White House aides with TS/SCI clearance? Changing administrations is a chaotic process, by all accounts. What corruption? It's not like Biden was showing off these documents.

The summary says the classified material was in the boxes. No mention of who put it there. Do you often read into text what you want to see? NVM, I know the answer.

That's the summary. The actual report says it doesn't know who packed Biden's boxes. There is no evidence..

Absent evidence, this is faith, not knowledge.

There are 3 comic book shops within a mile of my home. Just about every town around here big enough for a high school also has a shop. Across the river, St. Louis has a plethora of shops. The number of titles boggles the mind.

The lazy troll deflected, saying someone else should answer the question.

It's a tangent that arose from the effects of lockdowns on schooling.

Perhaps a redistribution would work under those circumstances, assuming there is a minimum as well.

Your area doesn't have city-by-city votes on property taxes? There is no solution to inequality that can't be sabotaged. I'm against proposals that increase inequality.

The private schools that admit the elite will get more direct investments from parents, local businesses, etc. Inequality will be exacerbated. This is human nature. Unless you are proposing state control of property taxes, the empty nesters will lower their burden, especially if their taxes...

It's more fun watching you twist the discussion completely out of context in order to score points. If you live in elite cities, the public schools are already better funded than the poor neighborhoods. What you're proposing is a transfer of funds from one public school system to another...

If you can't see the suffering, it doesn't exist.

Research grant money is earned through a competitive process. Loans and other tuition relief are available to every person, perhaps based on income only. I'm sure you are fine with the general public supporting schools for the elite.

I am a little disturbed that you find the material pornographic.