What's new

About the can't pay everyone problem. Needed to write down my thoughts.

vegas

Well-Known Member
Let me preface by saying that I am usually a perpetual optimist, so this is out of the norm. Also, as a warning I'm sure this is long and boring for everybody.

It reminds me of OKC's trouble when they had Westbrook, Durant, Harden and to a lesser extent Ibaka. They had to choose and couldn't turn an asset (Harden) into a younger cheaper version that had the same or greater value toward the goal of a title to satisfy the cap/payroll constraints.

Let me interrupt to say Hayward is the only comparable player we have to those 3, so we aren't as close as they were.

As I see it there are 3 ways to accumulate talent within the constraints of the CBA.
1. SA model where players trade money for the system, because they want to win/trust the franchise and their teammates.
2. Lebron chooses to come to your team, and even at a max salary talent-wise is a bargain and is enough to give a great advantage.
3. GS model. Sign injury prone players that the rest of the league believes won't last physically and then they magically don't get injured, plus a few hits in the draft.

It's no secret the Jazz are going for the SA model. The difference is SA started with Duncan/Robinson. Perhaps Hayward/Gobert can reach their level--maybe it's not fair to say we don't have players on that level since both have improved every year. The trouble is that so far imo only Favors has accepted a below market contract from the team. That is not enough to move the needle. This is one reason why I'm sure Larry Miller hated the Malone negotiations. When Malone made $19 mill, Stockton took $7.8 mill.

I think the FO has done a lot to get players give a hometown discount. P3, everybody was showing up to preseason games to support the young guys. I'm sure there is a ton of things they do to create camaraderie that we don't hear about. They have been very careful to select a specific types of players. Long, no head cases and work-a-holics. Lots of them have kids the same age even. It's a group that a guy like Joe Johnson likes because there are no knuckleheads. They made a goal to create camaraderie and I think they did a good job.

So back to the heart of this. If we are going to bring a championship, we have to acquire talent for below max money. Right now we have Dante, Trey, Neto, Bolomboy, Ingles and Rodney that will be RFA in the future. The rest are UFA. It was a huge deal that Favs and/or Hill didn't extend for a hometown discount. Not to mention we also lost the opportunity to front load and pay some of it this year.

So we have Gobert, and let's just assume we can convince Hayward to stay for the max, we are basically hoping to pull another Gobert draft miracle or develop some guys that hit ala Millsap. It's frustrating to know we are building around guys that are demanding the max. I know it's logical for players to want as much money as possible, but I believe signing talent to below market salaries is a key ingredient to bringing a championship to Utah, and so far we haven't had a ton of succes.
 
I think the biggest issue is that guys who aren't Top 20 players can make the same amount as a LeBron, Durant, etc. Max contracts really hurt teams like the Jazz in this regard, because the guys we get who demand the max aren't the same level as those type of players.
 
I dnt think they do that **** for a discount. They do it just so they will agree to re-sign here.
 
I think this is an interesting topic, as far as maximizing value for the money. In the end one you have a core that other players see can contend, then getting role players doesn't seem that difficult.
 
Nice post. I agree with a lot of your points. I think it will be next to impossible for the Jazz to expect their players to take a pay cut. The Spurs benefited greatly from winning a title in 98-99 when Tim Duncan was on his rookie contract and again in 02-03 when both Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili were on their rookie contracts. It allowed them the opportunity to say to these guys "hey if everyone agrees to a minor pay cut we can just keep winning". The Jazz unfortunately don't have that. I think the key for us is the timing of handing out those max deals. We have to be sure the team is set to compete for championships before we destroy our cap flexibility.
 
I think the biggest issue is that guys who aren't Top 20 players can make the same amount as a LeBron, Durant, etc. Max contracts really hurt teams like the Jazz in this regard, because the guys we get who demand the max aren't the same level as those type of players.
Yep, I've said this for years.
 
The only realistic way for Utah to win a title is through the draft. We've hit on Gobert and Hayward. We needed to hit on Exum. If Exum doesn't pan out, we are stuck in the Deron/Boozer cycle.

What the Jazz need to do is one of three things:

1 - Trade the farm for an All Star to pair with Gobert and Hayward. Everyone else is available.
2 - Hayward leaves next summer, you then trade the farm for assets and try again in the draft and hope Exum pans out and Exum and Gobert and the pick pan out and Gobert doesn't force his way out.
3 - Hayward stays and Exum pans out.

Not looking too good. We need PDX to give up on Lillard. I don't think any other star really makes us better and the one that would (Butler/George) don't want to be here.

Side note, we should never trade with GS ever again. We were fleeced by GS twice. Once by not tanking or their tanking, and this year's pick.
 
I dnt think they do that **** for a discount. They do it just so they will agree to re-sign here.
Not arguing that point. The Jazz do need to find players that have talent above their contract cost.

Might be because there is stigma (e.g. Injury prone)
Cheap because they are on their rookie contract
Gave a hometown discount etc

They have been trying desperately, and it has been necessary since the Days Larry ran the Joint. They just haven't had a lot of success other than rookie contracts, and Rodney is the last one left that has talent above his compensation rate at the moment IMO.

Edit, Sorry thought you were referring to players, not the FO. So I disagree with you. I was going to delete, but this already got quoted.
 
Last edited:
And even Rodney Hood is just an average NBA player. He isn't taking you anywhere.
 
Really only super duper stars win championships. Doesn't necessarily mean we shouldn't build the best team we can.

The cap issue is legitimate... we have guys that will likely be paid better relative to their production per dollar than the value other get from ring chasing declining stars and superstars on max contracts.

If you add in that the CBA has shorter contracts you are less likely to get a steph Curry like bargain. It all adds up to having more roster turnover at some point imo. Keep the irreplaceable parts but move things around as needed. I don't see us pushing chips to the middle for a star but rather making value trades with guys like Hood that will command a good return in a trade and hope to get lucky in the draft.

You have to add a Giannis or Butler type draft value to what we have to compete for a championship. We also need to get cheap contributions from draft picks. We are setup fairly well draft wise to supplement some of the holes we will have.

I think we just have to not think of it as the core four or five... it's the core two and it could use one more top 20 guy or it needs really solid pieces around it that fit perfectly.
 
You are right. In any salary capped league you need find guys who will buy in to what you are doing and willing to salary sacrifice for the greater good.

Its bad management/advice imo. Why not take 20% less to achieve the ultimate? It only takes 1 or 2 bad investments to lose everything anyway, money is so fickle. GLORY IS FOREVER!
 
Solution.

Mormon church gets way better at proselytizing major bb players in their young teenage years.
During every home study the teachers teach the dream of being able to play bb in SLC for God's team.

You get the gist.
 
I like the idea but this is too rigid IMO.. I also reject the premise that Haywards the only player we've got worth building around(that compares to Russ/Harden/KD). To me Rudy's ahead of Hayward in that aspect.

Agree with the taking less part tho.. that's what needs to be done TBPFH.. wouldn't get my hopes up tho..
 
Back
Top