What's new
By:

#anotherbabebook

B

babe

Well-Known Member
So, for a some while I've been thinking about this election cycle, and listening to Sirius 125 while I drive all over California. Wow. I saw the Bernie stickers come out in February, but so far I've only seen one Hillary sticker. Breitbart had folks out doing exit polling, and even Alex Jones had some people out doing that. Some say it was 80% Bernie, that Hillary had the party honchos agreeing on what the final tally would be the day before. The Party just made up the numbers.

The question is, why has the mainstream, corporate media been in the tank for Hillary? Why does that little protective cordon of staffers so carefully manage the context of wherever she goes, and why won't the media comment on her brain farts..... wow some the things she actually says are practically senile. . .., or her stumblings on the stage. I mean, that was a real hoot when Gerald Ford did that, and there's the whole drill about Ronnie's dementia. Who is managing HIllary's meds, anyway? She looks worse than Nancy Pelosi, and the speeches have be sorta edited, cut and paste fixed, to give her the pzaazzzz of a vibrant intellectual competent to play bingo with the church ladies.

So, folks, I'm saying that while the fix is in for Hillary whether Trump is a sincere contender or not, there's a whole lot of folks who just can't quite swallow the Hillary. If the Bigs let Hillary take the point, I'm saying it will significantly damage the brand of globalism for decades to come. David Rockefeller with all his transhumanism technologies installed has got to know that if the agenda is really going to go forward, he needs to at least have competent management.

And Hillary just isn't.

So let's make this the thread where we discuss how to fix the brand and keep the program on track.
 
babe said:
So, for a some while I've been thinking about this election cycle, and listening to Sirius 125 while I drive all over California. Wow. I saw the Bernie stickers come out in February, but so far I've only seen one Hillary sticker. Breitbart had folks out doing exit polling, and even Alex Jones had some people out doing that. Some say it was 80% Bernie, that Hillary had the party honchos agreeing on what the final tally would be the day before. The Party just made up the numbers.

The question is, why has the mainstream, corporate media been in the tank for Hillary? Why does that little protective cordon of staffers so carefully manage the context of wherever she goes, and why won't the media comment on her brain farts..... wow some the things she actually says are practically senile. . .., or her stumblings on the stage. I mean, that was a real hoot when Gerald Ford did that, and there's the whole drill about Ronnie's dementia. Who is managing HIllary's meds, anyway? She looks worse than Nancy Pelosi, and the speeches have be sorta edited, cut and paste fixed, to give her the pzaazzzz of a vibrant intellectual competent to play bingo with the church ladies.

So, folks, I'm saying that while the fix is in for Hillary whether Trump is a sincere contender or not, there's a whole lot of folks who just can't quite swallow the Hillary. If the Bigs let Hillary take the point, I'm saying it will significantly damage the brand of globalism for decades to come. David Rockefeller with all his transhumanism technologies installed has got to know that if the agenda is really going to go forward, he needs to at least have competent management.

And Hillary just isn't.

So let's make this the thread where we discuss how to fix the brand and keep the program on track.
Click to expand...

What "brand?"
 
I want to participate in babe's thread. The only thing I can say is that, in my California experience (limited as that may be), I also didn't meet very many Hillary supporters.
 
NAOS said:
I want to participate in babe's thread. The only thing I can say is that, in my California experience (limited as that may be), I also didn't meet very many Hillary supporters.
Click to expand...

but aren't you in Orange County somewhere? That's pretty R comparatively, say, to Compton.

Bernie billboards were all over the Berkley neighborhood, and I have even seen Trump signs along the I-80 in Auburn. I had one family tell me they were going to name their pup "Hillary" a year ago, but that's about it.

Speculation is rife that something is going to happen to Hillary, and her Veep, also a very dependable solid lapdog for the elites, will have to take the last lap. It might just be a medical condition. Her appearances in public are carefully staged, and very brief, and fully scripted, and she's been told to quit laughing. . . it sounds like a hyena. A number of very serious lapses in her delivery, even with a teleprompter, have been outed by unofficial witnesses, that are never left in the TV sound bites. She has a hard time standing up, and it's rumored she has a heart condition.

Beyond that, everybody knows she doesn't care about them.
 
babe said:
but aren't you in Orange County somewhere? That's pretty R comparatively, say, to Compton.

Bernie billboards were all over the Berkley neighborhood, and I have even seen Trump signs along the I-80 in Auburn. I had one family tell me they were going to name their pup "Hillary" a year ago, but that's about it.

Speculation is rife that something is going to happen to Hillary, and her Veep, also a very dependable solid lapdog for the elites, will have to take the last lap. It might just be a medical condition. Her appearances in public are carefully staged, and very brief, and fully scripted, and she's been told to quit laughing. . . it sounds like a hyena. A number of very serious lapses in her delivery, even with a teleprompter, have been outed by unofficial witnesses, that are never left in the TV sound bites. She has a hard time standing up, and it's rumored she has a heart condition.

Beyond that, everybody knows she doesn't care about them.
Click to expand...

I'm in LA. Near downtown.
 
NAOS said:
I'm in LA. Near downtown.
Click to expand...
The energy Hillary generates. . . .is remarkable. Ll.

I saw what a corruptPresident, even one fronting for the Rockefellers, does to a country, the Philippines in 197@ to 1972. I just want to hink this can't be the sort of progress anyone really wants, except those with money riding on it.
 
So the idea is to write THE hottest best-seller of the Hillary Presidency, a sort of challenge to the CFR intellectual crew, and the progressive movement in general, to recognize how damaging the Hillaries are, in every nation, to their hopes for a credible "better world through management", when they let total corruption go uncorrected.

Russia's Putin is the one who posed the question within the past few years, as to whether the program will reflect "new laws" or "no laws".

This is a challenge to the [MENTION=14]colton[/MENTION]s and @Kickies of JazzFanz to take the point and show the world the better way. It's one thing to plant an *** on an expensive chair and hold forth expansively about the merits of professional management as a solution to world problems, but to give Hillary a pass on pure cronyism is beyond the pale of reason. Surely if you want people to respect your views, you will see the problem here.

In Venezuela, Chavez worked his way up in political credibility by playing to the class divisions, the inequities of the upper 1%, and the need for various programs to care for the poorer folks. This is also Hillaries rhetoric. But once in power, Chavez showed his true colors and turned every state institution in his own little band of cronies. He not only dispread 80% of the wealth which the 1$ controlled to the 99%, he concentrated 95% into the top 0.1%. And then placed orders for conscripted labor to work the fields. . . Venezuela is a complete shambles.

Hillary----- the acolyte of Marxists and the dutiful minion of the Rockefellers---- has already brazenly unleashed the dogs of cronyism through the Clinton Foundations' pay-to-play game. It will get worse, not better, unless somehow the progressive principals start to police their own ranks.

Anybody got any ideas on how to do that?
 
babe said:
This is a challenge to the [MENTION=14]colton[/MENTION]s and @Kickies of JazzFanz to take the point and show the world the better way. It's one thing to plant an *** on an expensive chair and hold forth expansively about the merits of professional management as a solution to world problems, but to give Hillary a pass on pure cronyism is beyond the pale of reason. Surely if you want people to respect your views, you will see the problem here.
Click to expand...

Where have I ever given Hillary a pass? I can't stand the lady and most certainly will never vote for her.
 
Sure, here is a good book title for you babe: Our second good president Clinton.

We will have to wait until her presidency is over but we can start writing it now so we have a head start over everyone else who will want to write it towards the end of her presidency.

Lol, why stop at the Chavez comparison, Just go for the Hitler comparison. I've started seeing the entertainment of some of your cooky ramblings.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Broncster said:
Sure, here is a good book title for you babe: Our second good president Clinton.

We will have to wait until her presidency is over but we can start writing it now so we have a head start over everyone else who will want to write it towards the end of her presidency.

Lol, why stop at the Chavez comparison, Just go for the Hitler comparison. I've started seeing the entertainment of some of your cooky ramblings.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

Nah, Hitler is okay. He was neither a socialist nor a progressive, so babe got no problem with him.

Must-miss book of the year BTW.
 
colton said:
Where have I ever given Hillary a pass? I can't stand the lady and most certainly will never vote for her.
Click to expand...

And, actually, I have noticed that, as I note what I'd take as a fairly consistent positive view of life and efforts to make this world a better place. Which is precisely why I am addressing this question to you. How do we maneuver around the Hillaries who are in the game for all the wrong reasons? And making things worse, not better? What institutional fixes could we put into the program?
 
Broncster said:
Sure, here is a good book title for you babe: Our second good president Clinton.

We will have to wait until her presidency is over but we can start writing it now so we have a head start over everyone else who will want to write it towards the end of her presidency.

Lol, why stop at the Chavez comparison, Just go for the Hitler comparison. I've started seeing the entertainment of some of your cooky ramblings.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

surely you have your reasons, but without outlining them I'm left with the simple observation that there are indeed some people who won't see the problem with Hillary, or Bill, or sheer barefaced shameless debauchery of civil society.

You are ignorant of the facts concerning Hitler. I know you don't care to know better, but for the casual reader, here's my Reader's Digest condensed version of William Shirers' "The Third Reich". Hitler was a socialst as well as a fascist and a demagogue as barefaced as Trump.

Hitler's rise to power was financed by American industrialists who chaffed at the anti-Trust legislation in the US, and went abroad to build industrial facilities. The King of England, and the Fords and Rockefellers were thinking he was the best thing ever.
 
babe said:
And, actually, I have noticed that, as I note what I'd take as a fairly consistent positive view of life and efforts to make this world a better place. Which is precisely why I am addressing this question to you. How do we maneuver around the Hillaries who are in the game for all the wrong reasons? And making things worse, not better? What institutional fixes could we put into the program?
Click to expand...
Wow, that is a very good and very tough question. Right now I've got no idea.
 
babe said:
surely you have your reasons, but without outlining them I'm left with the simple observation that there are indeed some people who won't see the problem with Hillary, or Bill, or sheer barefaced shameless debauchery of civil society.

You are ignorant of the facts concerning Hitler. I know you don't care to know better, but for the casual reader, here's my Reader's Digest condensed version of William Shirers' "The Third Reich". Hitler was a socialst as well as a fascist and a demagogue as barefaced as Trump.

Hitler's rise to power was financed by American industrialists who chaffed at the anti-Trust legislation in the US, and went abroad to build industrial facilities. The King of England, and the Fords and Rockefellers were thinking he was the best thing ever.
Click to expand...
Good one, you're funny.
 
Hey babe, how did you investigation into whether the Boston Marahton Bombing was a CIA plot go? Did you get to the bottom of that?
 
babe said:
So the idea is to write THE hottest best-seller of the Hillary Presidency, a sort of challenge to the CFR intellectual crew, and the progressive movement in general, to recognize how damaging the Hillaries are, in every nation, to their hopes for a credible "better world through management", when they let total corruption go uncorrected.

Russia's Putin is the one who posed the question within the past few years, as to whether the program will reflect "new laws" or "no laws".

This is a challenge to the [MENTION=14]colton[/MENTION]s and @Kickies of JazzFanz to take the point and show the world the better way. It's one thing to plant an *** on an expensive chair and hold forth expansively about the merits of professional management as a solution to world problems, but to give Hillary a pass on pure cronyism is beyond the pale of reason. Surely if you want people to respect your views, you will see the problem here.

In Venezuela, Chavez worked his way up in political credibility by playing to the class divisions, the inequities of the upper 1%, and the need for various programs to care for the poorer folks. This is also Hillaries rhetoric. But once in power, Chavez showed his true colors and turned every state institution in his own little band of cronies. He not only dispread 80% of the wealth which the 1$ controlled to the 99%, he concentrated 95% into the top 0.1%. And then placed orders for conscripted labor to work the fields. . . Venezuela is a complete shambles.

Hillary----- the acolyte of Marxists and the dutiful minion of the Rockefellers---- has already brazenly unleashed the dogs of cronyism through the Clinton Foundations' pay-to-play game. It will get worse, not better, unless somehow the progressive principals start to police their own ranks.

Anybody got any ideas on how to do that?
Click to expand...
My idea is for everyone to get off the spaceship and walk in the real world.

I took your advice, babe, and listened to Sirius 125 for about twenty minutes. A guy named Andrew Wilkow was ranting, I mean actually shouting into the microphone, about how Hillary is a communist, saying this is not hyperbole folks, Hillary is an actual communist who wants to implement the principles of the Communist Manifesto and will do so if given the chance.

I realize this is an emotional election, a transformative election even, so there’s a lot at stake. But it borders on lunacy to characterize Clinton as a communist, another Chavez, and a Marxist devotee. In the same vein, it’s equally crazy to equate Trump with Mussolini, Caligula and Hitler. These are both flawed candidates with divergent views on virtually every issue facing our country, so there’s plenty to argue about. Why not start with their actual policies and what they actually say?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top