Does SLC really need to shutdown the section of North Temple between the conference center and the Temple for this?
We seem to be able to get people in and out of Jazz games and Utah football games, some of whom are drunk, at night without shutting down a major road. It just seems to be unnecessary.
I am pretty sure that was done to clear the area of protestors who would yell and scream at members attending conference. I'm sure they converted lots of Mormons from practicing Mormonism with all of their screams and insults...
I am pretty sure that was done to clear the area of protestors who would yell and scream at members attending conference. I'm sure they converted lots of Mormons from practicing Mormonism with all of their screams and insults...
I heard that some people were yelling "no/oppose" during conference and then getting up and leaving.
Over what specifically? Anyone know?
I heard that some people were yelling "no/oppose" during conference and then getting up and leaving.
Over what specifically? Anyone know?
I heard that some people were yelling "no/oppose" during conference and then getting up and leaving.
Over what specifically? Anyone know?
My favorite thing about being insulted that I am going to hell is to simply tell them that I will see them there. Usually shuts them right up.
This happens every now and then. They score tickets and feel like they will convince the all-mighty God to change his eternal doctrines by yelling in the meeting. I never understood that.
I thought Elder Holland's talk yesterday was pretty powerful. https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2017/04/media/session_2_talk_7/5381786756001?lang=eng. There are too many people that conflate doctrine with culture and as a result we end up with somewhat of a cookie-cutter mentality.
I also liked Yoon Hwan Choi's talk today. https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2017/04/media/session_4_talk_6/5382453542001?lang=eng
Perhaps it just has more to do with exercising one's voice in an organization well-known for top down authoritarian 'rule' and where requests for public approval are little more than pro forma, going through the motion charades with no pretense of taking any objections seriously in any case and where few (if any)official channels exist for rank and file to express views/concerns etc. to upper level management.
You should watch the talk, I gave a link to it above. I'd be interested in your reaction. To me it came off as being to both church members and leaders.I would note that in my experience a primary reason why members conflate culture with doctrine is because the church leaders do a poor job clarifying the difference for the members. After 40 years in the church as an active member, I couldn't even tell the difference between the two. Part of the problem as well is that even in their talks to the membership, church leaders often times present what are arguably cultural aspects of the church as doctrine of the church. My guess is that if you took a random sample of active church members with decades of membership in the church and quiz them on what is culture and what is doctrine, you would find a pretty wide diversity of opinion. So I do not know if it was Holland intention to place most of the blame for this on the membership, I did not read the talk so I can't comment on the specifics, but if this was the case, then I think he is placing too much of the blame on the membership when much of it needs to be attributed to the leadership.