Better: Balls or No-Balls?

[Jazz Insider]

which sports are better: ball sports or no-ball sports?

balls examples: football, basketball, pokemons, soccerball, bowlingball, tennisball, etc.

no balls examples: mma, hockey, snowboardin, wwe, hotdog eatin, cycling, etc.


been ponderin this quandary for quite some time.
but didnt know where to post it.
thx to the general sports forum, now i know.
general sports forum, you da real mvp.


not makin this a poll. they get enough attention. its all about balls here.
dont wanna see bar chart results, wanna know why you vote the way you do, so post it.
thx, from the inside. -Jazz Insider

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Balls make everything more fun.

 

[QuinSnydersHair]

Paging Katie.

 

[Gameface]

It really depends on what you have to do with the balls.

 

[moevillini]

I know it's a puck in hockey but I think it still qualifies as a ball sport - just that the ball is sort of flat


just my opinion FWIW

 

[nightmare3983]

Ball sports are better, but non-ball sports are good too.

 

[Stifle Tower]

Depends.

Not fun:

This one never gets old!

Who can resist a women who knows who to handle a big pole

Personally, I like to play with those who do NOT have balls. But there's nothing wrong with batting from the other side - or both sides. It's all about personal choice. And I'm sure if my gender were different, I'd be of the opposite opinion.

 

[One Brow]

I know it's a puck in hockey but I think it still qualifies as a ball sport - just that the ball is sort of flat


just my opinion FWIW

I agree. Just like Pokemon wouldn't be a sport with balls.