What's new

Bombs Away over the DMZ

babe

Well-Known Member
Well, at least "near the border".

I don't like Kelly sitting next to Trump, or McMaster. UN and CFR shills. Globalists and pedigreed militarists.

The old saw goes. "If your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" applies to having too much military brass near the supposedly civilian commander in chief.

But the worst part of it is just this. This is not why Americans voted for Trump in sufficient numbers to defeat Hillary in the EC.

Hillary was solidly in the militarist's pocket, and would have propelled us into useless foreign wars with no intention to win anything, just use a lot of ordnance and beef up the UN governance. But Trump has been hammered mercilessly until he turned to the militarists. Even Flynn was an Obama pick who would have led Trump into war. The entire effort Trump has made to appease the traditional power brokers and secure fair weather for sailing forward on some of his agenda is an immense failure.

Well, I think Russia and China will now look the other way while we take out the NK nuke operation and maybe the retarded leader. I think he rubs them all the wrong way. So maybe this won't be the trigger for WWIII, but still I would much prefer some people like Rand Paul advising Trump instead of Kelly.
 
Time to go live with Operation Jungle Lightning. Trump already showed em in July we can bomb the hell outa em from Guam. Evacuate Seoul an tell them ****ers ta surrender or git blown up.
 
China has already publicly said that if America or its allies strikes first they will come to N. Korea's aid. They do not want a land border with a major American ally.

As for Russia, they have no reason to look the other way. We are hitting them with increased sanctions and both countries are closing embassies or expelling diplomatic staff of the other. T hen there is the whole middle east, Ukraine and election problems. There is no leeway there. They are already panning the sanctions against N. Korea and are actively working to increase ties to N. Korea. They are wanting to pull N. Korea into their growing alliance that includes places like Iran, Cuba, Cambodia, Belarus and Syria.

Block by block...

Incredibly bad idea.
 
Time to go live with Operation Jungle Lightning. Trump already showed em in July we can bomb the hell outa em from Guam. Evacuate Seoul an tell them ****ers ta surrender or git blown up.

The Seoul metro area has over 25,000,000 people. It is a HUGE manufacturing base. Even empty of people it's destruction would be devastating to South Korea, who's wealth we'd really need in absorbing impoverished North Korea.
 
China has already publicly said that if America or its allies strikes first they will come to N. Korea's aid. They do not want a land border with a major American ally.

As for Russia, they have no reason to look the other way. We are hitting them with increased sanctions and both countries are closing embassies or expelling diplomatic staff of the other. T hen there is the whole middle east, Ukraine and election problems. There is no leeway there. They are already panning the sanctions against N. Korea and are actively working to increase ties to N. Korea. They are wanting to pull N. Korea into their growing alliance that includes places like Iran, Cuba, Cambodia, Belarus and Syria.

Block by block...

Incredibly bad idea.

Block all imports from China here, Europe an Japan. They will collapse overnight!
 
Block all imports from China here, Europe an Japan. They will collapse overnight!

Europe and Japan would never agree to that. They'd laugh in our faces.

Also I think doing that would absolutely guarantee battle lines being drawn. They'd go all in on places like the "Stans", Venezuela, Ecuador, Argentina, Mongolia, Vietnam and the African continent..

Bad idea after bad idea.
 
Time to go live with Operation Jungle Lightning. Trump already showed em in July we can bomb the hell outa em from Guam. Evacuate Seoul an tell them ****ers ta surrender or git blown up.

Damn I hate to be agreeing with Bullet and Stoked. Can't you try to be reasonable once in a while?
 
And in case it wasn't clear in my earlier post, I mention the 25,000,000 people because I highly doubt the rest of South Korea could absorb that population and provide the needed infrastructure to support them. In other words, once you evacuate them, where do they go? How do you feed them? How do you house them? How do you handle their waste? If it is an extended evacuation there is just no way to make it work. And besides, North Korea may much more easily pull the trigger on decimating the city if there are no people there. Then you've just allowed NK to cripple the South Korean economy very long term.
 
Last edited:
...Bad idea after bad idea.
Ideas involve thought, understanding, awareness, and some kind of detectable coherence. Treating nonsense as ideas gives way too much credence to what are Mad Hatter levels of gibberish.
 
evacuate seoul is basically impossible. I know it cause I lived there. it is so congested. hope nothing happens
 
Europe and Japan would never agree to that. They'd laugh in our faces.

Yah cause we are protectin them an Japan an South Korea an Israel an Canada an all the Stans an Turkey. Course they don't wanna upset this fools relationship they have goin on. Why change when American idiots pay fer it all?

Bomb them damn commies an git this world policing over with already.
 
Yah cause we are protectin them an Japan an South Korea an Israel an Canada an all the Stans an Turkey. Course they don't wanna upset this fools relationship they have goin on. Why change when American idiots pay fer it all?

Bomb them damn commies an git this world policing over with already.

Derp, derp.

You are offering an excellent course in how to destroy American power. Sure path to forced isolationism.

Impressive really.
 
Damn I hate to be agreeing with Bullet and Stoked. Can't you try to be reasonable once in a while?


It is a schtick. There is no real opinion here just a way to keep things riled up and have some fun at the expense of others. Most successful troll the site has ever seen.
 
Derp, derp.

You are offering an excellent course in how to destroy American power. Sure path to forced isolationism.

Impressive really.

I believe in isolation against evil regimes.

Rule number one You do not negotiate with terrorists. Yet we negotiate with terrorist regimes!

No more trade with China. No more trade with Mexico. No more trade with Iran. No more trade with ANY country that trades with human rights violating acumbag countries.


You either support human rights or you don't.
 
Rand Paul is too much of an isolationist. He'd rather bury his head in the sand and ignore the happenings in the world.
 
I believe in isolation against evil regimes.

Rule number one You do not negotiate with terrorists. Yet we negotiate with terrorist regimes!

No more trade with China. No more trade with Mexico. No more trade with Iran. No more trade with ANY country that trades with human rights violating acumbag countries.


You either support human rights or you don't.

Well, some of my nephews and nieces are adoptees from Korea. A bil fought there in the KW.

Joel Skousen says that NK has always been left there to be a useful trigger to start another war, would claim Russia and China understand that, and that of course they are both willing to do the skit. Another bowery war tgo help build up the Bigs, play with all the military toys, and reduce the crisis of world overpopulation. trophy slaves for all sides.

Ron Paul (and Rand) would find no constitutional basis for such a war.

Pretty sure McCain and the dems are all OK with the exercise so long as they can make Trump look like an idiot/madman and use it politically.

China and Russia are more rational than we've been in decades. America needs to be reduced to about third rate as a military power in order for the UN plans to run smoothly. As long as we have some risk of a Trump, there will be unknowns in all the equations.

oh boy, dingbat now has demonstrated a hydrogen bomb. lighter payload, bigger blast, longer range. Strutting like a little bantam rooster.

I'd send message runners to the Chinese and Russian saying this would not be a "bowery war", that we don't need regime change, and that we are going to build a defense ring that will effectively make nukes obsolete....
 
Well, some of my nephews and nieces are adoptees from Korea. A bil fought there in the KW.

Joel Skousen says that NK has always been left there to be a useful trigger to start another war, would claim Russia and China understand that, and that of course they are both willing to do the skit. Another bowery war tgo help build up the Bigs, play with all the military toys, and reduce the crisis of world overpopulation. trophy slaves for all sides.

Ron Paul (and Rand) would find no constitutional basis for such a war.

Pretty sure McCain and the dems are all OK with the exercise so long as they can make Trump look like an idiot/madman and use it politically.

China and Russia are more rational than we've been in decades. America needs to be reduced to about third rate as a military power in order for the UN plans to run smoothly. As long as we have some risk of a Trump, there will be unknowns in all the equations.

oh boy, dingbat now has demonstrated a hydrogen bomb. lighter payload, bigger blast, longer range. Strutting like a little bantam rooster.

I'd send message runners to the Chinese and Russian saying this would not be a "bowery war", that we don't need regime change, and that we are going to build a defense ring that will effectively make nukes obsolete....

Reduce to a third what kind of liberal logic is this? You do realize they just released a nuke that is 10 times more powerful the Hiroshima an can now attach it to a intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching USA?

If you walk up to me on the street an tell me you gonna murder me I am not givin you the chance to select a bullet,load your weapon, assure the safety is off, get on my knees for you an wait for ya ta pull the trigger. But that is what you suggest we deal with North Korea.

We should have settled this decades ago.
 
An for the rest of you libbies like [MENTION=1988]Stoked[/MENTION] prattling on bout drastically cutting military spending well now you see why we do it kids. We are in a arms race plain an simple an we are winning it by far. Back in Korea we dint have the manpower. Now we don't need nearly as much manpower cause we kin mutilate through technology.
 
An for the rest of you libbies like [MENTION=1988]Stoked[/MENTION] prattling on bout drastically cutting military spending well now you see why we do it kids. We are in a arms race plain an simple an we are winning it by far. Back in Korea we dint have the manpower. Now we don't need nearly as much manpower cause we kin mutilate through technology.

Yeah, but US special ops in 137 countries might be a bit much....

http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/176300/tomgram:_nick_turse,_the_commandos_of_everywhere/
 
Back
Top