What's new

Jazz Lost For This?

Stoked

Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
Am I the only one that feels the Jazz would have put up a much better fight than LA?

Jazz may have been swept but the games would not have been consistent 20-30 point blow outs. Love all the talk in Laker land at the beginning of the post season about Lakers in 2nd round, WCF and Champs.

I love the epicly brutal way that those insane fantasies were crushed, shredded and burned by the Spurs.
 
But they don't have Kobe. They don't have Nash. Beyond the lines of Howard and Gasol who do they have? A washed up Antawn Jamison..
 
No they would not have. They barely made the playoffs.

So glad that the Lakers attempts at another superteam blew up on them.
 
Plus we would have played OKC if we had made it. Houston would be playing the Spurs. Do you think we would have put up a better fight than Houston did last night? Assuming Tinsley would have taken Westbrook out in game 2 :P
 
The Jazz lost because they weren't good enough. That's the beginning and end of the story.
 
The funny thing is, going into the season, the Jazz had two options:

1 - play the vets, maybe get in the 8th spot and get destroyed by SA/OKC or maybe get the 9th spot and watch some other crap team get blown out.

2 - play the C4, probably lose a lot of games, get a good pick and have an even better 2014 year.

You screamed and shouted for #1.

You got what you wanted.
 
Back
Top