What's new
By:

More Chad Ford Speculation: #5 and Favors for #2 and Sanders

jakec11

jakec11

New Member
In today's (6-18) Chad Ford chat...

Derek (Salt Lake)
How much do you think the Jazz would be willing to give up for the 2nd spot to likely land Parker?

Chad Ford (1:18 PM)
I think it would cost them, at a minimum, Derrick Favors and the No. 5 pick. And they'd have to take back Larry Sanders. The Sanders contract isn't a bad one if you think this year's issues off the court have been resolved. He's a great shot blocker and rebounder. But that's a pretty high cost to move up.


Ryan (Utah)
Any truth to the rumor that the Jazz have zeroed in on Jabari?

Chad Ford (1:19 PM)
I know what Jazz fans want. They want Jabari. But I actually think Embiid and Wiggins may be higher on their boards. If they move up, don't assume it's for Parker. And please Jazz fans, don't burn down Dennis Lindsay's home if he passed on him. You'll love Wiggins too.

https://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/50786/nba-insider-chad-ford
 
jakec11 said:
In today's (6-18) Chad Ford chat...

Derek (Salt Lake)
How much do you think the Jazz would be willing to give up for the 2nd spot to likely land Parker?

Chad Ford (1:18 PM)
I think it would cost them, at a minimum, Derrick Favors and the No. 5 pick. And they'd have to take back Larry Sanders. The Sanders contract isn't a bad one if you think this year's issues off the court have been resolved. He's a great shot blocker and rebounder. But that's a pretty high cost to move up.


Ryan (Utah)
Any truth to the rumor that the Jazz have zeroed in on Jabari?

Chad Ford (1:19 PM)
I know what Jazz fans want. They want Jabari. But I actually think Embiid and Wiggins may be higher on their boards. If they move up, don't assume it's for Parker. And please Jazz fans, don't burn down Dennis Lindsay's home if he passed on him. You'll love Wiggins too.

https://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/50786/nba-insider-chad-ford
Click to expand...

Interesting but I don't see this happening. I think we would give them Kanter and 23 and the GS 2017 pick and maybe some 2nd round picks.

I do think we would take wiggins.
 
Everyone is underestimating how good it is for us that Favors likes playing in Utah and could be a very good player here for his entire career.
 
Qman said:
Interesting but I don't see this happening. I think we would give them Kanter and 23 and the GS 2017 pick and maybe some 2nd round picks.

I do think we would take wiggins.
Click to expand...

I agree it would be for Wiggins, because in that chat Chad Ford said at the end of the responses to Ryan (Utah) that we (Jazz fans) would love Wiggins too, meaning passing on Parker!
 
Last edited:
Heck, yes you do this! You'll have your choice of 2 of 3 potential all-stars and you get a shot-blocking rebounder who plays awesome interior defense.
 
What would be the ideal lineup at that point?

Burke
Hayward
Parker
Kanter
Sanders

or

Burke
Burks
Hayward
Parker
Sanders

or

Burke
Burks
Parker
Kanter
Sanders
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];848741 said:
Swing that deal with Kanter instead. Add a pick.

We gettin Wiggin
Click to expand...

Except you can't pick who you want to trade because you don't like them. If you want the deal, you have to include the player that moves the needle, and then figure out if you're comfortable with it. Without Sanders, Bucks need rim protection, and that's Favors.

Big price. I change my mind daily on this.
 
Sexual Favors said:
Except you can't pick who you want to trade because you don't like them. If you want the deal, you have to include the player that moves the needle, and then figure out if you're comfortable with it. Without Sanders, Bucks need rim protection, and that's Favors.

Big price. I change my mind daily on this.
Click to expand...

thanks for the dry, pointless, message-board coaching. bye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top