What's new
By:

Short circuiting the Judiciary

The Thriller

The Thriller

Well-Known Member
Thought this was worth a new thread. As Trump always does, he tries to break the system to his advantage. Those concerned with perceived biases and injustices in the case he was just convicted in will most certainly be outraged at this /s.

Why is the Speaker of the House insinuating that the Supreme Court will overturn Donald’s conviction?

www.publicnotice.co

Mike Johnson says the quiet part on Fox

"The justices on the court — I know many of them personally ... they'll set this straight."
www.publicnotice.co www.publicnotice.co

Especially given Alito’s and Thomas’s compromised positions?

Why is Trump paying off witnesses in other cases? Is he bribing people like he did with Flynn and Manafort (they got pardons)? This should be concerning to those who want a judicial system that’s fair and just. Right? This actual corruption is more concerning to me than the alleged bias right wing trolls claim to see.

www.propublica.org

Multiple Trump Witnesses Have Received Significant Financial Benefits From His Businesses, Campaign

Witnesses in the various criminal cases against the former president have gotten pay raises, new jobs and more. If any benefits were intended to influence testimony, that could be a crime.
www.propublica.org www.propublica.org
 
Not only is the speaker or the house a lawyer but...........

"I think that the justices on the court – I know many of them personally– I think they’re deeply concerned about that, as we are."
In theory, the case eventually could be taken up by the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, due to three justices which were nominated to the bench by the former president.



So nothing wrong with maga Mike trying to get the supreme Court, whom he has personal relationships with and whom the convicted felon appointed 3 of them to, to go ahead and overturn this conviction for their friend who is house speaker and for their other friend who gave them their jobs and happens to be the defendant.

Yep, totally on the up and up. No conflict of interest there.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
Not only is the speaker or the house a lawyer but...........

"I think that the justices on the court – I know many of them personally– I think they’re deeply concerned about that, as we are."
In theory, the case eventually could be taken up by the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, due to three justices which were nominated to the bench by the former president.



So nothing wrong with maga Mike trying to get the supreme Court, whom he has personal relationships with and whom the convicted felon appointed 3 of them to, to go ahead and overturn this conviction for their friend who is house speaker and for their other friend who gave them their jobs and happens to be the defendant.

Yep, totally on the up and up. No conflict of interest there.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Yeah what really sucks is we have no recourse really. No effective way to sanction or censure, or even really thoroughly investigate the SC. And they police themselves, which is meaningless as we saw in Alito's response. This is the kind of **** Rome was dealing with as it was collapsing. We are the modern Roman empire. And we are seeing the foundations beginning to crumble. The "me" generation is finally gaining in power and we are seeing exactly what that gets us.
 
Red said:
Travesty of Justice? I think not….

time.com

Debunking 12 Myths About Trump's Conviction

American legal expert Barbara McQuade breaks down several false claims about Trump's conviction being rigged.
time.com time.com
Click to expand...
There is a 2 word answer to all of this that can't be refuted...fake news. It's all fake news and everyone knows it. To paraphrase Homer Simpson, you can't prove anything even remotely true with facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top