What's new
By:

The answer to the question that EVERYBODY has been asking me!

Sloanfeld

Sloanfeld

Banned
This topic is dedicated to all of the CLOWNS that kept asking me how many points Boozer was averaging earlier in the season. Every time I talked about Boozer here or in chat, one of you, namely Revolution 9, Stickler, and a few more I can't positively identify, replied with 'how many points is Boozer averaging?' Naturally the answer was zero. Let's be real, anybody sitting on the bench in a suit for the first 15 games of the season is going to average zero points per game. Was John Stockton a lesser player than Penny Hardaway in 1997 because he missed the first 18 games of the season and Penny didn't? DIDN'T THINK SO. But under some of your logic the answer is most certaintly YES.

So now here we are, 14 games into the Chicago Bullzer era. You thought you were clever with that dumb 'zero ppg' response but you weren't. But alas, now your question gets a response.

Carlos Boozer is averaging 20.4 PPG. That's over a 204,000% increase from where he was just 30 days ago. And it's still going up.

Meanwhile, Jeffersuck is averaging a decent 16.4 points per game in over two times as many games. To all the 'give him some time' people, just look what Boozer has done in such a short amount of time. Boozer has fit in with the Bulls way better than Jefferson has fit in with us. And don't argue with me, you've seen the articles yourself that Jefferson was struggling to learn the offense.

Rebounds? Try 10.1 for Boozer and 8.8 for Jefferson.

And get this, I was watching NBA TV yesterday morning, and Steve Smith pointed out that since Boozer came back, Rose and another Bull were shooting 10% better from downtown since Boozer came back (because you know, Boozer commands a double team, PERIOD).

Anyway, I hope now you clowns who kept asking that question see how silly you look. I'm not going to let you get away with that crap.

BOOZER REIGNS SUPREME.
 
You don't belong here. Go to the Bulls message board and stop trolling, you annoying ****. Good for Boozer. We don't care.
 
Sloany, did you just compare Bozzer to Stockton. Dude, you know I love ya man, but get the **** out of here. Please.

I think these people will love you.

Furthermore, this ain't Tennis son. Individual stats don't matter. Team wins do. Currently the Jazz have a better record than the Bulls.

Once the Jazz implode and the Bulls pass 'em up, you can gloat all you want.
 
Sloanfeld said:
This topic is dedicated to all of the CLOWNS that kept asking me how many points Boozer was averaging earlier in the season. Every time I talked about Boozer here or in chat, one of you, namely Revolution 9, Stickler, and a few more I can't positively identify, replied with 'how many points is Boozer averaging?' Naturally the answer was zero. Let's be real, anybody sitting on the bench in a suit for the first 15 games of the season is going to average zero points per game. Was John Stockton a lesser player than Penny Hardaway in 1997 because he missed the first 18 games of the season and Penny didn't? DIDN'T THINK SO. But under some of your logic the answer is most certaintly YES.

So now here we are, 14 games into the Chicago Bullzer era. You thought you were clever with that dumb 'zero ppg' response but you weren't. But alas, now your question gets a response.

Carlos Boozer is averaging 20.4 PPG. That's over a 204,000% increase from where he was just 30 days ago. And it's still going up.

Meanwhile, Jeffersuck is averaging a decent 16.4 points per game in over two times as many games. To all the 'give him some time' people, just look what Boozer has done in such a short amount of time. Boozer has fit in with the Bulls way better than Jefferson has fit in with us. And don't argue with me, you've seen the articles yourself that Jefferson was struggling to learn the offense.

Rebounds? Try 10.1 for Boozer and 8.8 for Jefferson.

And get this, I was watching NBA TV yesterday morning, and Steve Smith pointed out that since Boozer came back, Rose and another Bull were shooting 10% better from downtown since Boozer came back (because you know, Boozer commands a double team, PERIOD).

Anyway, I hope now you clowns who kept asking that question see how silly you look. I'm not going to let you get away with that crap.

BOOZER REIGNS SUPREME.
Click to expand...


I don't get it
 
VINYLONE said:
Sloany, did you just compare Bozzer to Stockton.
Click to expand...

No, I think you totally misunderstood what the hell I just wrote. Here it is for you again:

Sloanfeld said:
This topic is dedicated to all of the CLOWNS that kept asking me how many points Boozer was averaging earlier in the season. Every time I talked about Boozer here or in chat, one of you, namely Revolution 9, Stickler, and a few more I can't positively identify, replied with 'how many points is Boozer averaging?' Naturally the answer was zero. Let's be real, anybody sitting on the bench in a suit for the first 15 games of the season is going to average zero points per game. Was John Stockton a lesser player than Penny Hardaway in 1997 because he missed the first 18 games of the season and Penny didn't? DIDN'T THINK SO. But under some of your logic the answer is most certaintly YES.
Click to expand...

I'm simply stating that people on this board used Boozer's injury as an excuse to justify the fact that they think Jeffersuck is better. I then compared that by saying that using their logic, since Stockton missed the first 18 games in 1997, that Penny Hardaway (or any healthy starting PG for that matter), was better than said injured player.

You feelin me now, dawg?
 
BOX said:
Here is a perfectly acceptable place for you to gloat about your man crush on Boozer. GTO

www.bullsconnect.com/
Click to expand...

I'm a Jazz fan first. I believe that we are worse off as a team without Boozer. With that said, I doubt Bulls fans would give a rats *** if I started topics about how the Jazz should have kept Boozer on a Bulls forum.
 
Sloanfeld said:
I'm a Jazz fan first. I believe that we are worse off as a team without Boozer. With that said, I doubt Bulls fans would give a rats *** if I started topics about how the Jazz should have kept Boozer on a Bulls forum.
Click to expand...

Except, do we not have a better record at this point than last year? The team is better this year, Boozer in some ways is better than Jefferson and other ways not. You cannot dispute that.
 
Sloanfeld said:
I'm a Jazz fan first. I believe that we are worse off as a team without Boozer. With that said, I doubt Bulls fans would give a rats *** if I started topics about how the Jazz should have kept Boozer on a Bulls forum.
Click to expand...

Should also add that on the jazz forum we dont give a rats *** either.
 
iStockSpilledMilkB.jpg
 
Here's what I just posted in another thread about the record garbage:

It bothers me that we didn't play as well as they should have for the first half of last season. After Gaines shot, we took off. Sure we had early injures to CJ and Korver, but our record should have been better. The fact is, we were one of the top teams in the NBA after that shot, and that was was more indicative of us as a team than any record prior to that. We've watched both teams. The record means jack ****. The team just didn't play well for almost half of the season. And Boozer was damn well the best player on our team until the all-star break. D-Will took command after that.
 
Sloanfeld said:
This topic is dedicated to all of the CLOWNS that kept asking me how many points Boozer was averaging earlier in the season. Every time I talked about Boozer here or in chat, one of you, namely Revolution 9, Stickler, and a few more I can't positively identify, replied with 'how many points is Boozer averaging?' Naturally the answer was zero. Let's be real, anybody sitting on the bench in a suit for the first 15 games of the season is going to average zero points per game. Was John Stockton a lesser player than Penny Hardaway in 1997 because he missed the first 18 games of the season and Penny didn't? DIDN'T THINK SO. But under some of your logic the answer is most certaintly YES.

So now here we are, 14 games into the Chicago Bullzer era. You thought you were clever with that dumb 'zero ppg' response but you weren't. But alas, now your question gets a response.

Carlos Boozer is averaging 20.4 PPG. That's over a 204,000% increase from where he was just 30 days ago. And it's still going up.

Meanwhile, Jeffersuck is averaging a decent 16.4 points per game in over two times as many games. To all the 'give him some time' people, just look what Boozer has done in such a short amount of time. Boozer has fit in with the Bulls way better than Jefferson has fit in with us. And don't argue with me, you've seen the articles yourself that Jefferson was struggling to learn the offense.

Rebounds? Try 10.1 for Boozer and 8.8 for Jefferson.

And get this, I was watching NBA TV yesterday morning, and Steve Smith pointed out that since Boozer came back, Rose and another Bull were shooting 10% better from downtown since Boozer came back (because you know, Boozer commands a double team, PERIOD).

Anyway, I hope now you clowns who kept asking that question see how silly you look. I'm not going to let you get away with that crap.

BOOZER REIGNS SUPREME.
Click to expand...

thisthreadsucks.jpg
 
Your response is obnoxious and does little to do anything besides further entrench the Boozer haters position. But at the core of your winding, bloviated rant is a good point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top