https://www.guardian.co.uk/commenti...justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer
I see it as politics-trumps-decency. Anyone support it?
I see it as politics-trumps-decency. Anyone support it?
"it would be unfair to prosecute dedicated men and women working to protect America for conduct that was sanctioned in advance by the justice department."
This article puts forth a lot of good points and essential truths. But when it comes to torcher, generally speaking, how do you argue with this statement.
To go back and prosecute someone because you believe what they did at the time should have been illegal while they were expressly told at the time that it was legal - now that's truly Orwellian.
While I believe that torture is never okay I also don't think it's okay to retroactively punish those who followed orders they were told were legal.
Not to succumb to Godwin's Law, but isn't that essentially the Nuremberg defense?
I have no sympathy at all for torturers. None. Throw them all in jail. I won't shed a tear or lose a moment's sleep.
One of the saddest legacies of the Bush (or is it Cheney) administration?