What's new

Blow it up?

I would be okay with trading any or all of those if it netted us a better player. But I'm not sure who would trade a better player for one of those guys. But Jazz should be active.

With all of the great rookies of this year and last you gotta think some nice young veteran players are going to be available soon. The field has gotten deeper. Maybe score one of those, get a star FA, work the draft picks via the blow up.
 
With all of the great rookies of this year and last you gotta think some nice young veteran players are going to be available soon. The field has gotten deeper. Maybe score one of those, get a star FA, work the draft picks via the blow up.
I think it's a great idea to go after some good free agents or trade for good players teams are dumping to tank. I'm okay with upgrading our roster at any spot. That's way different than blowing it up and tanking.

I also don't expect Jazz to win it all. I just want them to be a really good team that can win a series or two in they playoffs and maybe one day get lucky.
 
Boston have become more exciting without Hayward. How's that for "blowing it up"?

Now that we have two superstars is it time to shed some weight and go for the championship gamble?

Favors, Burks, Hood and maybe even Rubio... gone. Accumulate picks, get some young studs/free agents. Shoot for title in 2-4 years.

So I spent a few minutes berating you, but came to my senses and erased instead of hitting send. I just wanted u to know I typed some pretty disparaging remarks towards you
 
I think it's a great idea to go after some good free agents or trade for good players teams are dumping to tank. I'm okay with upgrading our roster at any spot. That's way different than blowing it up and tanking.

I also don't expect Jazz to win it all. I just want them to be a really good team that can win a series or two in they playoffs and maybe one day get lucky.

Hell no, no tank. We have Rudy and Donovan.
 
That is entering it usually it's 26 to 30, which Rudy will be soon. Either way another rookie isn't going to be entering their prime for quite awhile.

To me, prime doesn't translate to a span of years where the player will be his best. It means, at which age said player will play his best. I'm saying this, because IMO, we haven't seen the best or Rudy.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/2aa0r2/study_at_what_age_an_nba_player_reaches_his_peak/

This is a pretty cool read some dude put together about NBA players and their prime age in the NBA. Some interesting things come to mind when reading it.
 
To me, prime doesn't translate to a span of years where the player will be his best. It means, at which age said player will play his best. I'm saying this, because IMO, we haven't seen the best or Rudy.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/2aa0r2/study_at_what_age_an_nba_player_reaches_his_peak/

This is a pretty cool read some dude put together about NBA players and their prime age in the NBA. Some interesting things come to mind when reading it.

Actually, the more I look over the players used in the study, most centers peaked or had their most productive season before age 25. I think the difference is with Rudy, he doesn't have nearly the same NBA mileage as those guys at this point in his career. Hopefully, he's not peaked or peaks this year.
 
We should blow it up so that in 6 years after we get some good assets we can use them to blow it up for new assets that will mature 4-5 years from then, which I imagine we'll want to blow up. In 30-50 years it'll be championship time, maybe, like 20% chance it'll definitely be championships.
 
Back
Top