What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

Senator Cassidy has TDS. No one can read the bill because there is no bill.
If you dont have access to it (I dont believe you do) then you wouldn't know of its existence. It could exist without being passed or voted on yet. Meaning that congress could read it but trump and you and I couldn't.
Trump sure thinks it exists.

Trump, in a Nevada speech Saturday, said there was “zero chance” he’d support what he described as “this horrible open borders betrayal of America.”

“It’s not gonna happen. And I’ll fight it all the way. I noticed a lot of the senators are trying to say, respectfully, they’re blaming it on me. I say, that’s OK, please blame it on me. Please,” he said of efforts to tank the bill.
 
If you dont have access to it (I dont believe you do) then you wouldn't know of its existence.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer says there isn't a bill yet. As of last night he said they were getting close but there were a few points on which they still haven't come to agreement on. If anyone would know, it would be Chuck Schumer. As for Trump's speech, I don't find it the least bit surprising that he is trying to take credit for a thing he didn't do.
 
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer says there isn't a bill yet. As of last night he said they were getting close but there were a few points on which they still haven't come to agreement on. If anyone would know, it would be Chuck Schumer. As for Trump's speech, I don't find it the least bit surprising that he is trying to take credit for a thing he didn't do.
Sounds like Schumer says there is something. If they are close then that means there is something. You can call it a draft, some notes, or whatever but it certainly seems that something exists that some seem to like and want to get passed and trump seems to hate and not want to get passed even though he certainly hasn't seen the notes, draft, bill, whatever

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 

In a video obtained by Rolling Stone, Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) declared on Tuesday that “Congress doesn’t have to do anything to secure our southern border and fix it.”

“Why would I help Joe Biden approve his dismal 33 percent [approval rating] when he can fix the border and secure it on his own? He can secure it on his own through executive order.” Nehls added while waving around a cigar outside of the Capitol. He went on to cite former President Donald Trump’s slew of executive orders addressing immigration, many of which were ultimately found to be unconstitutional.

Nehls’ claim that it’s not Congress’ job to pass the legislation they’ve been demanding for months is absurd, and it also directly contradicts statements he made to Fox News in September of last year. Nehls told Fox News Digital that Republicans in the House had been granted a majority “for a reason” and were obliged to hold the Biden administration accountable.

"This starts with stopping the flow of illegal aliens burdening communities, combating human trafficking, and fighting the influx of fentanyl and illicit drugs poisoning our communities,” Nehls said, adding that “taxpayer dollars should be used to secure our nation, not further spread the consequences of an open border.”

“I was sent to Congress to fight for Texas, and I speak for them when I say they are sick and damn tired of empty promises,” Nehls said.

So why would the guy who felt so strongly about Congress’ responsibility to help secure the border suddenly turn tail and attempt to tank the most promising piece of bipartisan immigration legislation in recent years? Because it’s an election year.

Earlier this month, Nehls said in a statement to CNN that he’s “not willing to do too damn much right now to help a Democrat and to help Joe Biden’s approval rating.”.

“I will not help the Democrats try to improve this man’s dismal approval ratings,” he added. “I’m not going to do it. Why would I? Chuck Schumer has had HR 2 on his desk since July. And he did nothing with it.”

Nehls used similar logic when discussing the GOP’s push to impeach Joe Biden. In a video obtained by Rolling Stone, he responded “Donald J. Trump 2024, baby!” when asked about the move.

Trump has been directly involved in efforts to kill the Senate border deal, openly encouraging Republicans to reject the legislation on social media, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) admitted to Fox News earlier this month that he’s been communicating directly with the former president about the issue.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell warned his colleagues in the lower chamber that they’re unlikely to get a better deal on immigration, even if Trump wins in 2024. But House Republicans seem committed to continuing their pattern of obstruction and infighting over the advancement of conservative policy goals. Why? Because as Nehls’ recent statements make clear that the ultimate Republican priority is re-electing Trump.



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 

In a video obtained by Rolling Stone, Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) declared on Tuesday that “Congress doesn’t have to do anything to secure our southern border and fix it.”

“Why would I help Joe Biden approve his dismal 33 percent [approval rating] when he can fix the border and secure it on his own? He can secure it on his own through executive order.” Nehls added while waving around a cigar outside of the Capitol. He went on to cite former President Donald Trump’s slew of executive orders addressing immigration, many of which were ultimately found to be unconstitutional.

Nehls’ claim that it’s not Congress’ job to pass the legislation they’ve been demanding for months is absurd, and it also directly contradicts statements he made to Fox News in September of last year. Nehls told Fox News Digital that Republicans in the House had been granted a majority “for a reason” and were obliged to hold the Biden administration accountable.

"This starts with stopping the flow of illegal aliens burdening communities, combating human trafficking, and fighting the influx of fentanyl and illicit drugs poisoning our communities,” Nehls said, adding that “taxpayer dollars should be used to secure our nation, not further spread the consequences of an open border.”

“I was sent to Congress to fight for Texas, and I speak for them when I say they are sick and damn tired of empty promises,” Nehls said.

So why would the guy who felt so strongly about Congress’ responsibility to help secure the border suddenly turn tail and attempt to tank the most promising piece of bipartisan immigration legislation in recent years? Because it’s an election year.

Earlier this month, Nehls said in a statement to CNN that he’s “not willing to do too damn much right now to help a Democrat and to help Joe Biden’s approval rating.”.

“I will not help the Democrats try to improve this man’s dismal approval ratings,” he added. “I’m not going to do it. Why would I? Chuck Schumer has had HR 2 on his desk since July. And he did nothing with it.”

Nehls used similar logic when discussing the GOP’s push to impeach Joe Biden. In a video obtained by Rolling Stone, he responded “Donald J. Trump 2024, baby!” when asked about the move.

Trump has been directly involved in efforts to kill the Senate border deal, openly encouraging Republicans to reject the legislation on social media, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) admitted to Fox News earlier this month that he’s been communicating directly with the former president about the issue.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell warned his colleagues in the lower chamber that they’re unlikely to get a better deal on immigration, even if Trump wins in 2024. But House Republicans seem committed to continuing their pattern of obstruction and infighting over the advancement of conservative policy goals. Why? Because as Nehls’ recent statements make clear that the ultimate Republican priority is re-electing Trump.



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
It’s sad that actual solutions and much needed aid to Ukraine and Israel, are all collateral damage to Trump and his cultists in Congress.

Btw, imagine if Democrats had blocked Covid funding in 2020 to exacerbate the pandemic in order to prevent a perceived win for Trump? It’s crazy to me how it’s just baked into our system that only one party is expected to act as adults while the other one isn’t held to any standard. They can merely act as nihilist children and we just shrug. “Let Putin win in Ukraine to give Biden a loss? Meh.”
 
I don't think you understand that phrase.

None of us think Biden is as sharp as he was in 2020. None of us think Kamala has been a popular VP.
Ya like the entire world knows it but for some reason people in the administration can’t say it out loud?
I think you understood what I was saying yet somehow thought I didn’t.
 
Ya like the entire world knows it but for some reason people in the administration can’t say it out loud?
I think you understood what I was saying yet somehow thought I didn’t.
I understood that you misused a reference. I still don't think you understand why that doesn't mean what you think it means.

I'm just going to be honest with you. I don't think you are particularly smart. You can't even find your way to agreeing with people who agree with you on specific points. You're always trying to be the smartest person in the discussion. These issues aren't important to you in the larger context of the world we live in, they are important to you because you think you've figured something out that no one else has. Any discussion you have is about your ego, not about the actual substance. You may not be young, but you are a child.
 
Biden is East coast, Kamala is West coast. She was a serious candidate in 2020. To say she is simply a DEI plug-in is ignorant and seriously misinformed.

lol no She had a contentious record as a prosecutor. She was the earliest exit from running for President. She was specifically chosen because she's a woman of colour. And she's atrocious. End of story.
 
I understood that you misused a reference. I still don't think you understand why that doesn't mean what you think it means.

I'm just going to be honest with you. I don't think you are particularly smart. You can't even find your way to agreeing with people who agree with you on specific points. You're always trying to be the smartest person in the discussion. These issues aren't important to you in the larger context of the world we live in, they are important to you because you think you've figured something out that no one else has. Any discussion you have is about your ego, not about the actual substance. You may not be young, but you are a child.
You are describing yourself in this 2 post interaction. We agree but you will need to explain to me how I misused a simple reference. I couldn’t possibly understand what it means because otherwise we agree on something, is that right? It’s about my ego but yet here you are to tell me I’m a child and to explain it to me.

I googled the meaning of the phrase for us and found this.

Meaning:​

This expression is used to describe a situation in which people are afraid to criticize someone because the perceived wisdom is that the person is good or important.

What was the source saying about Joe and Kamala? Why would someone need to go undercover to get this information that everyone knows? How does this not apply? Please explain, because my ego hangs in the balance. Unless there is a real specific meaning that only you know, in that case I should really appreciate you bestowing that knowledge and wisdom onto me.
 
lol no She had a contentious record as a prosecutor. She was the earliest exit from running for President. She was specifically chosen because she's a woman of colour. And she's atrocious. End of story.
Yeah, DEI is so dumb.

I get it man. If a person isn't white then the reason they exist is because of DEI. Anytime a non-white is doing something it's because a white person is trying to be DEI compliant.

Cool
 
You are describing yourself in this 2 post interaction. We agree but you will need to explain to me how I misused a simple reference. I couldn’t possibly understand what it means because otherwise we agree on something, is that right? It’s about my ego but yet here you are to tell me I’m a child and to explain it to me.

I googled the meaning of the phrase for us and found this.

Meaning:​

This expression is used to describe a situation in which people are afraid to criticize someone because the perceived wisdom is that the person is good or important.

What was the source saying about Joe and Kamala? Why would someone need to go undercover to get this information that everyone knows? How does this not apply? Please explain, because my ego hangs in the balance. Unless there is a real specific meaning that only you know, in that case I should really appreciate you bestowing that knowledge and wisdom onto me.
People who are voting for Biden are criticizing Biden for the things you're saying they are afraid to criticize him for.

Are we done? Because I'm done. You don't say things that are insightful, meaningful, or unique. I can get your take 100 times a day form various idiots who are suffering from Dunning Kruger Effect.
 
It’s gonna be a long four years for some of you when 2024 plays out mostly like 2022, 2020, and 2018 did. Trump has never been very popular even at the height of his popularity and he’s done nothing to expand the tent. Biden doesn’t have to be Jesus. He just has to be more preferable to the Trump MAGA crap that some of you bored cultists want for entertainment.
 
Yeah, DEI is so dumb.

I get it man. If a person isn't white then the reason they exist is because of DEI. Anytime a non-white is doing something it's because a white person is trying to be DEI compliant.

Cool

really ?? that's where you're going ?? You really think Kamala Harris is a capable person as VP ?? Enough that you're whining racist ?? geez

The Biden campaign was very clear after he won the nomination that they wanted to select a woman of colour. Which is great, all for it. It's just a shame they picked one so dreadfully inept.
 
Top