I'm going to want some seconds too.I would be offering to take Gabe Vincent into our capspace for unprotecting that 27 pick.
I think there is chatter about it whereas in the past there was none. Lowe and Woj both just mentioning to watch it is meaningful imo. I think it’s like a 10% chance type of thing but I can see scenarios where outside opportunities and scenarios may have some influence.
I think you're confused. The conversation was about if the Sixers were tampering for the small possibility of getting a discount on a Lauri trade.Wait why is Paul saying he won’t be back with the clips. He already knows after 5 minutes that Philly are offering a better deal… how? It would be illegal for them to already have had conversations. Why would the risk a severe tampering penalty?
I’m not following everything 100%, but whenever I see a tweet that something along the lines of “Jazz listening to offers” - per Woj it has always been media aggregation BS.
Like it will be Woj on ESPN, the tv host asks him specifically about Lauri, and Woj responds with something simple to make it interesting but reiterates the Jazz don’t want to do this. But the aggregators will chop out the context. It’s this simple formula that drives clicks, headlines.
Not saying that’s what you’re referencing, but that’s all I’ve personally seen.
They would be tampering to make it happen… they “don’t have enough to get him”. So it’s the difference of having him or not having him.I think you're confused. The conversation was about if the Sixers were tampering for the small possibility of getting a discount on a Lauri trade.