What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Hearsky said:
You didn't answer the question.
Click to expand...
I did. You just didn’t like the answer.

Again, this board needs better posters. We need not stupid trolly posters on here. Let’s stop being stupid for clicccckkksssss

This is the last warning you’ll have. Stop with the trolling. Be very careful and thoughtful with your next post.
 
Seems like a good sign


View: https://x.com/actblue/status/1815198823771165179?s=46


And again, you see the right in complete freak out right now. They’re calling Harris DEI. They’re calling this a coup. They cant make up their mind whether Harris is weak or strong. They’re defending Biden and calling this illegal while also calling Biden a drooling fool who can’t tie his own shoes.

Pretty obvious that their plans have been scrambled with this patriotic move by Biden. Now they’re the one with the old dementia ridden candidate. Just a reminder, Trump is the oldest candidate in history.

This is a good article. The choice is clear.

www.theatlantic.com

A Candidate, Not a Cult Leader

After Biden’s decision to leave the race, the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans could not be clearer.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com

Biden’s decision is now also a challenge to every voter in the pro-democracy coalition to live by their words. For two years, many Americans lamented the choice between the aging Biden and the dissolute, unbalanced Trump. Their wish has been granted: They will now likely have a choice between a shouty, 78-year-old habitual liar whose life is a record of shame and failure and a 59-year-old woman who has served honorably as a big-state attorney general, a senator, and the vice president of the United States.

Harris has her critics, and she will bring her own vulnerabilities to a campaign. Every American should assess her record with judicious skepticism, as they would that of any other politician. But in the end, if the vice president is the eventual nominee, she will be a candidate similar to many others throughout American history who can claim a long record of senior-government experience. (Like Trump, for example, she has been given briefs on nuclear-launch procedures. Unlike Trump, she almost certainly understood them.)

Every voter who cares about democracy but has claimed to be paralyzed by the two old men in the race will now have no excuses for indecision. The Democrats have made clear that they intend to field a stable, experienced candidate. The Republicans, a cult of personality in the grip of fevered delusions, will field Trump. Tonight, Americans have the clarity they demanded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TheStormofWar said:
DEI... Dude, she was the ****ing VP. She beats Trump in more than a few polls and Biden doesn't step aside unless the numbers supported it. Nearly all of the party, the donors, and leadership has rallied around and endorsed her. Find some new talking points.
Click to expand...

Whinging about DEI is so lame.
 
Douchebag K said:
Democrats have a handful of really good politicians who are so much more articulate and not compromised who would be a much better choice than Harris. Same as the Republicans who also had many far better choices that the narcissist who now has a God complex if he didn't already have one. Shame. Pete B would've been an excellent choice that really could've swung things.

and sorry anyone who denies Harris was 100 % DEI and not merit is nothing more than a blinkered fool Enjoy the coming all round ********
Click to expand...

Yes on the Dems, Although between Pete, Big Gretch and the others you might like, compared to Coconuts, the policy prescriptions aren't going to change at all, really. As long as she wins, I don't give AF.

No for the Republicans, only Trump has the sauce, but they're all basically demons just with different levels of negative charisma
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top