Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

[Sardines]

Kyle Rittenhouse says hi!

 

[Zombie]

Kyle Rittenhouse says hi!

Turns out the post was fake so I deleted it.

 

[Rubashov]

trump is such a douche.
Talks **** about NATO all the time and now wants to invoke article 5 for their help with our southern border which I always hear him claiming he has already fixed.

Trump Suggests Invoking Article 5 to Get NATO to Help With U.S. Border

In a Truth Social post, President Trump suggested putting the world’s strongest military alliance “to the test” by invoking its mutual defense clause.

time.com

Under what legal authority would they operate?

 

[fishonjazz]

Under what legal authority would they operate?

Article 5 I guess.


Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk

 

[fishonjazz]

 

[fishonjazz]

If government agents can murder you for having a licensed, registered, holstered legal firearm then you don't have a right to bear arms.

 

[Eminence]

If government agents can murder you for having a licensed, registered, holstered legal firearm then you don't have a right to bear arms.

I know you're emphasizing the point - but even if that had been Osama Bin Laden firing an AK at every passerby - they had him subdued and it was not their place to make the call to execute him.

ICE agents are untrained idiots who are going to continue to put the general public at risk through their actions.

 

[Sardines]

 

[Rubashov]

If government agents can murder you for having a licensed, registered, holstered legal firearm then you don't have a right to bear arms.

Its not so much that citizens don't have rights, its that Trump's Brown Shirts are beyond the law.

 

[Rubashov]

Article 5 I guess.


Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk

I doubt "the border" meets the criteria for article 5. But what I'm really asking is, lets say the Parachute Regiment, The Royal Marines and the Household Cavalry are getting around Texas patrolling the border, what legal framework are the detaining people under?

 

[fishonjazz]

I doubt "the border" meets the criteria for article 5. But what I'm really asking is, lets say the Parachute Regiment, The Royal Marines and the Household Cavalry are getting around Texas patrolling the border, what legal framework are the detaining people under?

Beats me but when trump is involved, legal often isn't.

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk

 

[LogGrad98]

I doubt "the border" meets the criteria for article 5. But what I'm really asking is, lets say the Parachute Regiment, The Royal Marines and the Household Cavalry are getting around Texas patrolling the border, what legal framework are the detaining people under?

The supreme Court made this clear, it's called the "Brown Face Doctrine". If you have a brown face they have permission, from the supreme court no less, to detain and deport you without due process.